BITW vs. IETH
BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and IETH (Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BITW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, while IETH is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Bitwise. BITW is passively managed, while IETH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for IETH.
Performance
BITW vs. IETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.14% return, which is significantly higher than IETH's -33.81% return.
BITW
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- -32.94%
- YTD
- -30.14%
- 1Y
- -43.69%
- 3Y*
- 51.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
IETH
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- 6M
- -36.34%
- YTD
- -33.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW vs. IETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -30.14% | -27.66% |
IETH Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF | -33.81% | -27.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITW and IETH is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITW vs. IETH — Risk / Return Rank
BITW
IETH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITW vs. IETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF (IETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITW | IETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITW vs. IETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than IETH's maximum drawdown of -59.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and IETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITW | IETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -59.76% | -36.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -56.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.47% | -54.24% | -16.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.58% | -39.46% | -30.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.66% | — | — |
Volatility
BITW vs. IETH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITW | IETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.73% | 59.70% | -9.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.29% | 59.70% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.95% | 59.70% | +48.25% |
BITW vs. IETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than IETH's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITW vs. IETH - Dividend Comparison
BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 47.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IETH Bitwise Ethereum Option Income Strategy ETF | 47.80% | 18.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, BITW and IETH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BITW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BITW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for IETH.
IETH has the higher dividend yield at 47.80%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.
BITW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while IETH is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.97% for IETH.
Find the right allocation for BITW and IETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer