BITW vs. CBOO
BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) are both exchange-traded funds - BITW is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index, while CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos. BITW is passively managed, while CBOO is actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBOO.
Performance
BITW vs. CBOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.09% return, which is significantly lower than CBOO's 0.06% return.
BITW
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -15.18%
- YTD
- -30.09%
- 6M
- -31.04%
- 1Y
- -33.61%
- 3Y*
- 53.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 0.06%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW vs. CBOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -30.09% | -31.90% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.06% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITW and CBOO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITW vs. CBOO — Risk / Return Rank
BITW
CBOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITW vs. CBOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITW | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITW vs. CBOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than CBOO's maximum drawdown of -2.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and CBOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITW | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -2.34% | -94.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.45% | -1.62% | -68.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.56% | -1.60% | -67.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.38% | — | — |
Volatility
BITW vs. CBOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITW | CBOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.88% | 2.07% | +47.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.58% | 2.07% | +63.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.37% | 2.07% | +106.30% |
BITW vs. CBOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CBOO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITW vs. CBOO - Dividend Comparison
BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITW and CBOO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BITW.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.
BITW is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while CBOO is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.69% for CBOO.
Find the right allocation for BITW and CBOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer