BITW vs. BTCZ
BITW (Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. BITW is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. Over the past year, BITW returned -33.61% vs 49.49% for BTCZ. At a correlation of -0.89, they often move in opposite directions. BITW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BTCZ.
Performance
BITW vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BITW achieves a -30.09% return, which is significantly lower than BTCZ's 32.42% return.
BITW
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -15.18%
- YTD
- -30.09%
- 6M
- -31.04%
- 1Y
- -33.61%
- 3Y*
- 53.76%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- —
BTCZ
- 1D
- -5.19%
- 1M
- 32.11%
- YTD
- 32.42%
- 6M
- 35.01%
- 1Y
- 49.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITW vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | -30.09% | -2.63% | 76.31% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 32.42% | -29.11% | -76.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between BITW and BTCZ is -0.96, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2024 | -0.89 |
The correlation between BITW and BTCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.96 to -0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BITW vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank
BITW
BTCZ
BITW vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BITW | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.16 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.61 | 1.01 | -1.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.04 | 2.00 | -3.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BITW vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BITW drawdown since its inception was -96.46%, which is greater than BTCZ's maximum drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITW and BTCZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BITW | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.46% | -91.06% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.51% | -49.02% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.45% | -78.64% | +8.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.56% | -73.67% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.38% | 24.85% | +7.53% |
Volatility
BITW vs. BTCZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF (BITW) is 13.95%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ) has a volatility of 26.14%. This indicates that BITW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BITW | BTCZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.95% | 26.14% | -12.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.24% | 68.73% | -31.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.88% | 88.69% | -38.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.58% | 97.07% | -31.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 108.37% | 97.07% | +11.30% |
BITW vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BITW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCZ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BITW vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison
BITW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BTCZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BITW Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BITW and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTCZ has higher volatility (26.14%) compared to BITW (13.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BITW dropped -96.46% vs BTCZ's -91.06%.
On 1-year performance, BTCZ leads with 49.49% vs -33.61% for BITW. On fees, BITW is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BITW has been the lower-risk option at 13.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BTCZ has performed better with a 49.49% return vs -33.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITW is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.01%, compared with 0.00% for BITW.
They also come from different issuers: Bitwise and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BITW and 0.95% for BTCZ.
BTCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BITW and BTCZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer