BITQ vs. TCAI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI).

BITQ and TCAI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BITQ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Bitwise Crypto Innovators 30 Total Return. It was launched on May 11, 2021. TCAI is an actively managed fund by Tortoise. It was launched on Aug 4, 2025.

Performance

BITQ vs. TCAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BITQ vs. TCAI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	-5.37%	3.59%
TCAI Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF	16.67%	17.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITQ achieves a -5.37% return, which is significantly lower than TCAI's 16.67% return.

BITQ

• 1D: 5.90%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -5.37%
• 6M: -24.77%
• 1Y: 55.35%
• 3Y*: 48.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TCAI

• 1D: 4.49%
• 1M: -6.61%
• YTD: 16.67%
• 6M: 16.89%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BITQ vs. TCAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITQ has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TCAI's 0.65% expense ratio.

BITQ

Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF

TCAI

Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF

Return for Risk

BITQ vs. TCAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITQ

BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 51
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 51
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITQ vs. TCAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) and Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF (TCAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BITQ	TCAI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.14	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BITQ	TCAI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	1.80	-1.85

Correlation

The correlation between BITQ and TCAI is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BITQ vs. TCAI - Dividend Comparison

BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCAI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BITQ Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.90%	1.51%	0.00%	3.12%
TCAI Tortoise AI Infrastructure ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

BITQ vs. TCAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITQ drawdown since its inception was -90.32%, which is greater than TCAI's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITQ and TCAI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BITQ	TCAI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.32%	-15.80%	-74.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.99%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-41.83%	-8.07%	-33.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.87%	-3.97%	-49.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.73%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BITQ	TCAI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.99%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.04%	35.03%	+24.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.79%	35.03%	+32.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.79%	35.03%	+32.76%