PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BISMX vs. ARHBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) and Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BISMX achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than ARHBX's 22.55% return.


BISMX

1D
-1.21%
1M
-2.53%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
1.75%
1Y
13.14%
3Y*
28.94%
5Y*
16.91%
10Y*
10.74%

ARHBX

1D
-2.20%
1M
4.72%
YTD
22.55%
6M
24.61%
1Y
26.72%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
-0.11%45.81%23.44%39.27%5.52%
ARHBX
Artisan International Explorer Fund
22.55%18.32%8.34%20.65%-2.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BISMX and ARHBX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2022

0.72

The correlation between BISMX and ARHBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BISMX vs. ARHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BISMX
BISMX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
BISMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BISMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
BISMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BISMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
BISMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ARHBX
ARHBX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
ARHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ARHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) and Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BISMXARHBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.33

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

2.87

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

8.32

-4.64

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BISMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the ARHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BISMX and ARHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BISMXARHBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.82

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

1.14

-0.30

Drawdowns

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BISMX drawdown since its inception was -47.07%, which is greater than ARHBX's maximum drawdown of -18.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BISMX and ARHBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BISMXARHBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.07%

-18.10%

-28.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-9.51%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.61%

-14.20%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.36%

-2.20%

-6.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-3.53%

-4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

3.27%

+0.65%

Volatility

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I (BISMX) is 3.31%, while Artisan International Explorer Fund (ARHBX) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that BISMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BISMXARHBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

6.98%

-3.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

13.00%

-2.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

15.03%

-2.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.88%

14.47%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

14.47%

-0.22%

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BISMX has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is lower than ARHBX's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BISMX vs. ARHBX - Dividend Comparison

BISMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than ARHBX's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARHBX
Artisan International Explorer Fund
6.07%7.44%4.86%1.97%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BISMX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class I
3.34%3.34%3.22%2.93%4.16%3.45%0.92%0.82%4.10%8.51%4.16%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


BISMX and ARHBX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ARHBX has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to BISMX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BISMX dropped -47.07% vs ARHBX's -18.10%.

ARHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BISMX and ARHBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer