BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR.TO) and Fiera Capital Corporation (FSZ.TO).
Performance
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIR.TO Birchcliff Energy Ltd. | 2.70% | 40.38% | 0.78% | -31.82% | 49.92% | 266.82% | -28.72% | -11.42% | -29.00% | -52.19% |
FSZ.TO Fiera Capital Corporation | -12.17% | -25.18% | 64.40% | -20.20% | -9.43% | 6.43% | 0.20% | 11.75% | -7.28% | 6.99% |
Fundamentals
BIR.TO:
CA$2.11B
FSZ.TO:
CA$676.09M
BIR.TO:
CA$0.24
FSZ.TO:
CA$0.34
BIR.TO:
32.24
FSZ.TO:
15.91
BIR.TO:
0.26
FSZ.TO:
1.12
BIR.TO:
2.99
FSZ.TO:
1.85
BIR.TO:
0.94
FSZ.TO:
2.59
BIR.TO:
CA$699.57M
FSZ.TO:
CA$335.05M
BIR.TO:
CA$353.46M
FSZ.TO:
CA$287.06M
BIR.TO:
CA$383.56M
FSZ.TO:
CA$155.29M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIR.TO achieves a 2.70% return, which is significantly higher than FSZ.TO's -12.17% return. Over the past 10 years, BIR.TO has outperformed FSZ.TO with an annualized return of 9.42%, while FSZ.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -1.01% annualized return.
BIR.TO
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- 12.00%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 34.44%
- 1Y
- 16.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 28.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
FSZ.TO
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -6.76%
- YTD
- -12.17%
- 6M
- -15.01%
- 1Y
- -6.47%
- 3Y*
- -1.92%
- 5Y*
- -3.00%
- 10Y*
- -1.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BIR.TO
FSZ.TO
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR.TO) and Fiera Capital Corporation (FSZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIR.TO | FSZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.51 | -0.23 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.89 | -0.12 | +1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.98 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.64 | -0.29 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.23 | -0.63 | +1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIR.TO | FSZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 | -0.23 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | -0.10 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | -0.03 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.15 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIR.TO and FSZ.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Dividend Comparison
BIR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FSZ.TO's 8.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIR.TO Birchcliff Energy Ltd. | 1.57% | 1.61% | 7.38% | 13.84% | 2.86% | 0.39% | 2.32% | 4.02% | 3.29% | 2.27% | 5.34% | 0.00% |
FSZ.TO Fiera Capital Corporation | 8.09% | 8.71% | 9.55% | 14.12% | 9.91% | 8.06% | 7.87% | 7.17% | 6.91% | 5.38% | 4.85% | 4.76% |
Drawdowns
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.49%, which is greater than FSZ.TO's maximum drawdown of -87.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIR.TO and FSZ.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIR.TO | FSZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.49% | -87.31% | -12.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.43% | -23.62% | -2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.04% | -53.89% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -93.47% | -61.45% | -32.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.81% | -44.42% | +21.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.24% | -42.55% | -14.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.72% | 10.75% | +2.97% |
Volatility
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.96% compared to Fiera Capital Corporation (FSZ.TO) at 7.18%. This indicates that BIR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIR.TO | FSZ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.96% | 7.18% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.20% | 16.40% | +5.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.04% | 28.54% | +3.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.66% | 29.27% | +11.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.55% | 30.77% | +19.78% |
Financials
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Birchcliff Energy Ltd. and Fiera Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BIR.TO vs. FSZ.TO - Profitability Comparison
BIR.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Birchcliff Energy Ltd. reported a gross profit of 55.30M and revenue of 188.05M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.4%.
FSZ.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fiera Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 152.42M and revenue of 174.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 87.6%.
BIR.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Birchcliff Energy Ltd. reported an operating income of 41.73M and revenue of 188.05M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.
FSZ.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fiera Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 32.67M and revenue of 174.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.
BIR.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Birchcliff Energy Ltd. reported a net income of 27.17M and revenue of 188.05M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.
FSZ.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fiera Capital Corporation reported a net income of 7.67M and revenue of 174.03M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.