BIR.TO vs. CJ.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR.TO) and Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BIR.TO or CJ.TO.
Key characteristics
| BIR.TO | CJ.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -2.73% | 13.44% |
| 1Y Return | -19.64% | 15.21% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 27.07% | 40.65% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.66% | 24.57% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -5.37% | -2.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.56 | 0.46 |
| Daily Std Dev | 37.12% | 25.50% |
| Max Drawdown | -99.49% | -97.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -52.40% | -41.73% |
Fundamentals
| BIR.TO | CJ.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$1.52B | CA$1.16B |
| EPS | CA$0.04 | CA$0.65 |
| PE Ratio | 141.75 | 11.32 |
| PEG Ratio | -0.44 | 5.59 |
| Revenue (TTM) | CA$699.93M | CA$481.12M |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$1.13B | CA$386.37M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$273.11M | CA$256.88M |
Correlation
The correlation between BIR.TO and CJ.TO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
BIR.TO vs. CJ.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BIR.TO achieves a -2.73% return, which is significantly lower than CJ.TO's 13.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BIR.TO has underperformed CJ.TO with an annualized return of -5.37%, while CJ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher -2.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BIR.TO vs. CJ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR.TO) and Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BIR.TO vs. CJ.TO - Dividend Comparison
BIR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.68%, more than CJ.TO's 10.47% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIR.TO Birchcliff Energy Ltd. | 12.68% | 13.84% | 2.86% | 0.39% | 2.33% | 4.05% | 3.29% | 2.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CJ.TO Cardinal Energy Ltd. | 10.47% | 11.46% | 4.99% | 0.00% | 3.66% | 5.77% | 17.79% | 8.25% | 3.97% | 9.58% | 5.28% |
Drawdowns
BIR.TO vs. CJ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIR.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.49%, roughly equal to the maximum CJ.TO drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIR.TO and CJ.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BIR.TO vs. CJ.TO - Volatility Comparison
Birchcliff Energy Ltd. (BIR.TO) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Cardinal Energy Ltd. (CJ.TO) at 6.98%. This indicates that BIR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CJ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BIR.TO vs. CJ.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Birchcliff Energy Ltd. and Cardinal Energy Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities