BIOY vs. LQTI

Last updated Jun 30, 2026

BIOY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIOY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.

Performance

BIOY vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF (BIOY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BIOY

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.80%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LQTI

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.10%
• 1Y: 4.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIOY vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BIOY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF	0.69%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between BIOY and LQTI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

BIOY vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIOY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LQTI

LQTI Risk / Return Rank: 29
LQTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
LQTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LQTI Omega Ratio Rank: 25
LQTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
LQTI Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIOY vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF (BIOY) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIOY	LQTI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.96	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.41	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.17	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.44	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.26	—

Drawdowns

BIOY vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIOY drawdown since its inception was -5.07%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIOY and LQTI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIOY	LQTI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-3.41%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-0.57%	-0.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-0.89%	-1.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.15%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BIOY	LQTI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	5.11%	+10.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	5.92%	+10.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.02%	5.92%	+10.10%

BIOY vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIOY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIOY vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison

BIOY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.48%, more than LQTI's 9.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
BIOY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Biotech ETF	9.48%	0.00%
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF	9.03%	7.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIOY and LQTI in my portfolio?

BIOY and LQTI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BIOY or LQTI?

On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIOY or LQTI?

LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BIOY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIOY or LQTI?

BIOY has the higher dividend yield at 9.48%, compared with 9.03% for LQTI.

What is the main difference between BIOY and LQTI?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BIOY and 0.65% for LQTI.