BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about The Biotech Growth Trust plc (BIOG.L) and L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCG.L).

DOCG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Jun 26, 2019.

Performance

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in The Biotech Growth Trust plc (BIOG.L) and L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BIOG.L The Biotech Growth Trust plc	6.67%	40.35%	-4.36%	-3.46%	-22.05%	-24.62%	67.66%	21.76%
DOCG.L L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF	-5.52%	16.50%	3.57%	-6.64%	-25.94%	1.46%	63.33%	0.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIOG.L achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly higher than DOCG.L's -5.52% return.

BIOG.L

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 6.67%
• 6M: 24.88%
• 1Y: 71.12%
• 3Y*: 17.80%
• 5Y*: -2.60%
• 10Y*: 7.69%

DOCG.L

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -4.55%
• YTD: -5.52%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 20.30%
• 3Y*: 1.87%
• 5Y*: -4.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIOG.L

BIOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 92
BIOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BIOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
BIOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 88
BIOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BIOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

DOCG.L

DOCG.L Risk / Return Rank: 46
DOCG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
DOCG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
DOCG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 41
DOCG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
DOCG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Biotech Growth Trust plc (BIOG.L) and L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIOG.L	DOCG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	0.94	+1.50
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	1.43	+1.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.17	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.83	1.34	+4.49
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.13	4.28	+12.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIOG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the DOCG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIOG.L and DOCG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIOG.L	DOCG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	0.94	+1.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	-0.20	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.19	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between BIOG.L and DOCG.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither BIOG.L nor DOCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIOG.L drawdown since its inception was -85.07%, which is greater than DOCG.L's maximum drawdown of -51.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIOG.L and DOCG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIOG.L	DOCG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.07%	-51.45%	-33.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.76%	-15.66%	-0.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.68%	-49.65%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.27%	-31.80%	+5.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.80%	-26.99%	-9.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	4.92%	-0.60%

Volatility

BIOG.L vs. DOCG.L - Volatility Comparison

The Biotech Growth Trust plc (BIOG.L) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCG.L) at 6.90%. This indicates that BIOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOCG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIOG.L	DOCG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.89%	6.90%	+2.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.07%	14.26%	+6.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.94%	21.47%	+7.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.36%	21.95%	+4.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.39%	23.42%	+3.97%