DOCG.L vs. VBR
Compare and contrast key facts about L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCG.L) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR).
DOCG.L and VBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DOCG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. It was launched on Jun 26, 2019. VBR is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Small Cap Value Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both DOCG.L and VBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: DOCG.L or VBR.
Key characteristics
DOCG.L | VBR | |
---|---|---|
YTD Return | -0.94% | 6.15% |
1Y Return | -6.85% | 24.35% |
3Y Return (Ann) | -10.15% | 5.21% |
Sharpe Ratio | -0.14 | 1.54 |
Daily Std Dev | 48.37% | 16.57% |
Max Drawdown | -51.45% | -62.01% |
Current Drawdown | -40.74% | -0.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOCG.L and VBR is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
DOCG.L vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, DOCG.L achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than VBR's 6.15% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DOCG.L vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOCG.L has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.07% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
DOCG.L vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCG.L) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
DOCG.L vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
DOCG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 2.03% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.77% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
DOCG.L vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOCG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.45%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -62.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOCG.L and VBR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
DOCG.L vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
L&G Healthcare Breakthrough UCITS ETF (DOCG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.43%. This indicates that DOCG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.