PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BINC vs. PRAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BINC vs. PRAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BINC

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.27%
6M
0.42%
YTD
1.11%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
6.67%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.76%

PRAB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.08%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$70.16M$76.44M$122.66M
$4.91K$7.76K$91.52K

BINC vs. PRAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BINC and PRAB is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.62

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BINC vs. PRAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PRAB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BINC vs. PRAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) and State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF (PRAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BINCPRABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

BINC vs. PRAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BINC vs. PRAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINC drawdown since its inception was -2.69%, which is greater than PRAB's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINC and PRAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BINCPRABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-0.48%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.50%

-0.06%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.36%

-0.08%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

Volatility

BINC vs. PRAB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BINCPRABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36%

1.08%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.97%

1.08%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.97%

1.08%

+1.89%

BINC vs. PRAB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than PRAB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BINC vs. PRAB - Dividend Comparison

BINC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.86%, more than PRAB's 1.48% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.42%5.86%6.14%3.13%
PRAB
State Street IG Public & Private ABS ETF
1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BINC and PRAB have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRAB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRAB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BINC.

BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.42%, compared with 1.48% for PRAB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BINC and 0.39% for PRAB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BINC and PRAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer