PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

BILL.AX (iShares Core Cash ETF) and GLDN.AX (Ishares Physical Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILL.AX is a Money Market fund tracking the S&P/ASX Bank Bill Index, while GLDN.AX is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM AUD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BILL.AX returned 4.03% vs 12.58% for GLDN.AX. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BILL.AX charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for GLDN.AX.

Performance

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in iShares Core Cash ETF (BILL.AX) and Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILL.AX achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than GLDN.AX's -11.15% return.

BILL.AX

1D
0.04%
1M
0.40%
6M
2.09%
YTD
2.24%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.36%
5Y*
3.25%
10Y*
—

GLDN.AX

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.83%
6M
-16.42%
YTD
-11.15%
1Y
12.58%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
BILL.AX
iShares Core Cash ETF		2.24%4.25%4.57%0.73%
GLDN.AX
Ishares Physical Gold ETF		-11.15%55.11%38.15%-3.32%

Correlation

The correlation between BILL.AX and GLDN.AX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Cash ETF

Ishares Physical Gold ETF

Often compared with GLDN.AX:
GLDN.AX vs. GDXGLDN.AX vs. NDQ.AXGLDN.AX vs. BTGDGLDN.AX vs. BOLD.DEGLDN.AX vs. ICOM.LGLDN.AX vs. IOZ.AXGLDN.AX vs. GLD

Return for Risk

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BILL.AX
BILL.AX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BILL.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILL.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILL.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BILL.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILL.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX
GLDN.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
GLDN.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDN.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Cash ETF (BILL.AX) and Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BILL.AXGLDN.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
4.34
0.49

+3.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
6.56
0.81

+5.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

3.26

1.12

+2.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.39

0.46

+10.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.49

1.00

+36.49

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILL.AX Sharpe Ratio is 4.34, which is higher than the GLDN.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILL.AX and GLDN.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILL.AX drawdown since its inception was -0.37%, smaller than the maximum GLDN.AX drawdown of -26.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILL.AX and GLDN.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BILL.AXGLDN.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.37%

-26.62%

+26.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.34%

-26.62%

+26.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.37%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.37%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-26.28%

+26.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.02%

-5.16%

+5.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

12.44%

-12.34%

Volatility

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Cash ETF (BILL.AX) is 0.07%, while Ishares Physical Gold ETF (GLDN.AX) has a volatility of 6.35%. This indicates that BILL.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDN.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BILL.AXGLDN.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

6.35%

-6.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.64%

21.71%

-21.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89%

25.11%

-24.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.69%

19.55%

-18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.55%

19.55%

-19.00%

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILL.AX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GLDN.AX's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BILL.AX vs. GLDN.AX - Dividend Comparison

BILL.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.97%, while GLDN.AX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILL.AX
iShares Core Cash ETF		3.97%4.13%4.46%3.69%0.98%0.02%0.46%1.50%1.83%0.61%
GLDN.AX
Ishares Physical Gold ETF		0.00%0.07%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

BILL.AX and GLDN.AX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BILL.AX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BILL.AX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for GLDN.AX.

BILL.AX is categorized as Money Market, while GLDN.AX is Gold. BILL.AX tracks S&P/ASX Bank Bill Index, while GLDN.AX tracks LBMA Gold Price PM AUD Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for BILL.AX and 0.18% for GLDN.AX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILL.AX and GLDN.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer