BIIEX vs. YACKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brandes International Equity Fund (BIIEX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX).
BIIEX is managed by Brandes. It was launched on Jan 1, 1997. YACKX is managed by AMG. It was launched on Jul 6, 1992.
Performance
BIIEX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIIEX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIIEX Brandes International Equity Fund | 2.59% | 38.82% | 7.17% | 30.40% | -8.46% | 12.86% | -1.83% | 14.48% | -9.52% | 15.14% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 5.65% | 1.34% | 13.15% | 15.46% | -7.50% | 19.66% | 15.25% | 27.49% | 2.79% | 18.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIIEX achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 5.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BIIEX has underperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 10.02%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.36% annualized return.
BIIEX
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 28.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
YACKX
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -5.34%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- 5.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 7.14%
- 10Y*
- 11.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIIEX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIIEX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIIEX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank
BIIEX
YACKX
BIIEX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes International Equity Fund (BIIEX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIIEX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.87 | 0.26 | +1.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 0.42 | +2.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.10 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 0.26 | +2.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.76 | 0.77 | +8.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIIEX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.87 | 0.26 | +1.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.42 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.71 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.68 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIIEX and YACKX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BIIEX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison
BIIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, while YACKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIIEX Brandes International Equity Fund | 6.01% | 6.17% | 2.95% | 2.51% | 3.57% | 3.81% | 1.86% | 3.76% | 2.83% | 1.80% | 3.58% | 2.53% |
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 17.32% | 4.39% | 7.35% | 3.72% | 10.82% | 16.84% | 23.06% | 10.67% | 8.57% | 13.66% |
Drawdowns
BIIEX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIIEX drawdown since its inception was -58.76%, which is greater than YACKX's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIIEX and YACKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIIEX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.76% | -46.65% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -16.30% | +5.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.73% | -19.86% | -9.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.67% | -30.93% | -11.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.69% | -9.42% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.64% | -5.28% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 5.50% | -2.70% |
Volatility
BIIEX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison
Brandes International Equity Fund (BIIEX) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) at 5.19%. This indicates that BIIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIIEX | YACKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | 5.19% | +1.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.81% | 19.29% | -9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 21.08% | -5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 17.03% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.99% | 16.10% | +0.89% |