BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO
BIGY.TO (Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BIGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Evolve, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BIGY.TO charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIGY.TO achieves a -9.61% return, which is significantly lower than CASH.TO's 0.91% return.
BIGY.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | -9.61% | -1.05% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.91% | 0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIGY.TO and CASH.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BIGY.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CASH.TO
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIGY.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 7.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 113.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 389.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIGY.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.81%, which is greater than CASH.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIGY.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIGY.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.81% | -0.80% | -27.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.91% | 0.00% | -18.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -0.00% | -11.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIGY.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.05% | 0.24% | +28.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.05% | 0.61% | +28.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.05% | 0.61% | +28.44% |
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIGY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIGY.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
BIGY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.05%, more than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | 30.05% | 9.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIGY.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
BIGY.TO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CASH.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Evolve and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for BIGY.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for BIGY.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer