BIBDX vs. CSUAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX).
BIBDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 6, 2008. CSUAX is a passively managed fund by Cohen & Steers that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure 50/50 Index. It was launched on Aug 28, 2017.
Performance
BIBDX vs. CSUAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIBDX vs. CSUAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | -5.08% | 19.32% | 9.72% | 16.59% | -13.72% | 17.70% | 6.91% | 22.80% | -10.46% | 19.39% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 8.35% | 14.30% | 8.30% | 2.09% | -5.20% | 16.24% | -1.65% | 24.26% | -5.83% | 17.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIBDX achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than CSUAX's 8.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIBDX having a 7.86% annualized return and CSUAX not far behind at 7.48%.
BIBDX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -10.17%
- YTD
- -5.08%
- 6M
- -2.99%
- 1Y
- 12.41%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.09%
- 10Y*
- 7.86%
CSUAX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 8.97%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- 10.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIBDX vs. CSUAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIBDX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CSUAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIBDX vs. CSUAX — Risk / Return Rank
BIBDX
CSUAX
BIBDX vs. CSUAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIBDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 1.63 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 2.17 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.32 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.36 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.33 | 10.32 | -5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIBDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 1.63 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.61 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.50 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIBDX and CSUAX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIBDX vs. CSUAX - Dividend Comparison
BIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.22%, more than CSUAX's 7.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | 21.22% | 20.14% | 8.09% | 2.00% | 6.51% | 18.01% | 5.94% | 7.97% | 7.05% | 6.47% | 2.47% | 4.34% |
CSUAX Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 7.46% | 8.09% | 2.23% | 2.17% | 3.55% | 2.95% | 1.30% | 1.52% | 2.08% | 5.00% | 2.04% | 6.20% |
Drawdowns
BIBDX vs. CSUAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIBDX drawdown since its inception was -41.81%, smaller than the maximum CSUAX drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBDX and CSUAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIBDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.81% | -52.20% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -7.98% | -2.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -20.45% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.15% | -35.05% | +1.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.38% | -4.38% | -6.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -8.49% | +2.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 1.83% | +0.80% |
Volatility
BIBDX vs. CSUAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (CSUAX) at 3.26%. This indicates that BIBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSUAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIBDX | CSUAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.23% | 3.26% | +1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.85% | 6.89% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 11.48% | +3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 12.89% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 14.89% | +0.21% |