PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAQX vs. LVAZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund (BIAQX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAQX achieves a 14.73% return, which is significantly lower than LVAZX's 24.39% return.


BIAQX

1D
3.36%
1M
-1.00%
6M
4.90%
YTD
14.73%
1Y
33.93%
3Y*
16.09%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
7.82%
ALL TIME*
5.07%

LVAZX

1D
3.05%
1M
-1.28%
6M
13.15%
YTD
24.39%
1Y
46.61%
3Y*
25.42%
5Y*
14.83%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BIAQX
Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund
14.73%29.80%8.83%10.55%-15.20%1.55%18.34%10.70%
LVAZX
LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund
24.39%39.90%7.26%21.26%-13.03%13.77%5.03%5.91%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAQX and LVAZX is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2019

0.86

The correlation between BIAQX and LVAZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAQX vs. LVAZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BIAQX
BIAQX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
BIAQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAQX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

LVAZX
LVAZX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LVAZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVAZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVAZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LVAZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVAZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund (BIAQX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIAQXLVAZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.41

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.76

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

11.29

-4.17

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the LVAZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAQX and LVAZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAQX drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, which is greater than LVAZX's maximum drawdown of -37.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAQX and LVAZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAQXLVAZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-37.87%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.93%

-11.58%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-15.02%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.03%

-27.07%

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.50%

-8.88%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-6.76%

-4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.30%

3.85%

+0.45%

Volatility

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund (BIAQX) and LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund (LVAZX) have volatilities of 8.35% and 8.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAQXLVAZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

8.31%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.51%

18.28%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.66%

19.93%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

15.34%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

16.41%

+0.71%

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAQX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LVAZX's 1.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAQX vs. LVAZX - Dividend Comparison

BIAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than LVAZX's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAQX
Brown Advisory Emerging Markets Select Fund
1.39%1.60%1.87%1.59%1.13%0.52%0.44%0.89%3.75%0.81%1.17%0.99%
LVAZX
LSV Emerging Markets Equity Fund
4.12%5.12%1.39%4.58%3.14%8.50%2.54%2.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BIAQX and LVAZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BIAQX has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to LVAZX (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAQX dropped -40.55% vs LVAZX's -37.87%.

LVAZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAQX and LVAZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer