PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIAHX vs. UEPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) and ProFunds Europe 30 Fund (UEPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAHX achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than UEPIX's 25.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAHX has outperformed UEPIX with an annualized return of 11.67%, while UEPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.21% annualized return.


BIAHX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.95%
YTD
0.84%
6M
3.22%
1Y
11.59%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
12.19%
10Y*
11.67%

UEPIX

1D
0.54%
1M
9.78%
YTD
25.52%
6M
26.43%
1Y
43.85%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
0.84%47.26%10.85%19.36%-11.95%14.54%11.34%29.43%-16.60%32.37%
UEPIX
ProFunds Europe 30 Fund
25.52%28.46%2.60%18.54%-7.83%24.46%-9.97%17.87%-12.48%19.92%

Correlation

The correlation between BIAHX and UEPIX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.81

The correlation between BIAHX and UEPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIAHX vs. UEPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAHX
BIAHX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BIAHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAHX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAHX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

UEPIX
UEPIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
UEPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UEPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UEPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UEPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
UEPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) and ProFunds Europe 30 Fund (UEPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIAHXUEPIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

3.05

-2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

4.04

-2.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.53

-0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

6.42

-5.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.61

22.30

-19.69

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIAHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the UEPIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAHX and UEPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIAHXUEPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

3.05

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.77

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.55

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.10

+0.48

Drawdowns

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAHX drawdown since its inception was -34.90%, smaller than the maximum UEPIX drawdown of -76.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAHX and UEPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIAHXUEPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.90%

-76.06%

+41.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.18%

-6.74%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

-15.84%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.95%

-26.62%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.90%

-40.51%

+5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.93%

0.00%

-6.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.03%

-43.19%

+37.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

1.94%

+2.29%

Volatility

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) is 4.90%, while ProFunds Europe 30 Fund (UEPIX) has a volatility of 6.00%. This indicates that BIAHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UEPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIAHXUEPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

6.00%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.49%

11.43%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.93%

14.26%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.36%

17.03%

-0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.29%

18.76%

-1.47%

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAHX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than UEPIX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIAHX vs. UEPIX - Dividend Comparison

BIAHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than UEPIX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIAHX
Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund
7.54%7.60%5.16%1.13%2.66%9.72%6.39%9.78%12.12%0.83%1.19%0.00%
UEPIX
ProFunds Europe 30 Fund
1.32%1.66%0.00%1.43%1.98%0.87%2.64%0.82%12.56%0.96%3.21%11.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIAHX and UEPIX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UEPIX has higher volatility (6.00%) compared to BIAHX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIAHX dropped -34.90% vs UEPIX's -76.06%.

UEPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIAHX and UEPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer