PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHE vs. JBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHE vs. JBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (BHE) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHE achieves a 87.48% return, which is significantly higher than JBL's 38.24% return. Over the past 10 years, BHE has underperformed JBL with an annualized return of 15.29%, while JBL has yielded a comparatively higher 32.67% annualized return.


BHE

1D
0.44%
1M
-7.38%
6M
53.75%
YTD
87.48%
1Y
114.38%
3Y*
46.58%
5Y*
27.39%
10Y*
15.29%
ALL TIME*
11.52%

JBL

1D
2.12%
1M
-7.69%
6M
32.90%
YTD
38.24%
1Y
44.34%
3Y*
42.76%
5Y*
39.99%
10Y*
32.67%
ALL TIME*
20.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$34.75M$38.21M$42.62M
$328.00M$358.66M$472.99M

BHE vs. JBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHE
Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
87.48%-4.19%67.14%6.33%1.13%2.69%-18.97%65.72%-25.48%-4.59%
JBL
Jabil Inc.
38.24%58.73%13.25%87.43%-2.55%66.40%3.89%68.49%-4.41%12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BHE and JBL is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 1993

0.48

Over the past year, BHE and JBL have become more correlated (0.75) than their long-term average of 0.48, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BHE:

$2.87B

JBL:

$33.01B

EPS

BHE:

$1.47

JBL:

$7.99

PE Ratio

BHE:

54.41

JBL:

39.44

PEG Ratio

BHE:

9.17

JBL:

2.11

PS Ratio

BHE:

1.03

JBL:

1.01

PB Ratio

BHE:

1.31

JBL:

25.36

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHE:

$2.82B

JBL:

$33.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHE:

$288.24M

JBL:

$3.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

BHE:

$107.23M

JBL:

$1.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHE vs. JBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BHE
BHE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHE Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

JBL
JBL Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
JBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
JBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBL Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BHE vs. JBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (BHE) and Jabil Inc. (JBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHEJBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.18

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

1.63

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.57

4.81

+10.75

BHE vs. JBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHE Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is higher than the JBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHE and JBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHE vs. JBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHE drawdown since its inception was -75.48%, smaller than the maximum JBL drawdown of -94.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHE and JBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHEJBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.48%

-94.92%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.89%

-25.54%

+0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.73%

-36.83%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.73%

-36.83%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.34%

-57.34%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.15%

-18.30%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.15%

-44.36%

+19.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.09%

8.62%

-1.53%

Volatility

BHE vs. JBL - Volatility Comparison

Benchmark Electronics, Inc. (BHE) has a higher volatility of 17.80% compared to Jabil Inc. (JBL) at 16.74%. This indicates that BHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHEJBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.80%

16.74%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.40%

35.11%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.21%

44.42%

-1.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.47%

38.61%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.16%

37.39%

-0.23%

Dividends

BHE vs. JBL - Dividend Comparison

BHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, more than JBL's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHE
Benchmark Electronics, Inc.
0.85%1.59%1.48%2.39%2.47%2.42%2.37%1.75%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JBL
Jabil Inc.
0.10%0.14%0.22%0.25%0.47%0.45%0.75%0.77%1.29%1.22%1.35%1.37%

Financials

BHE vs. JBL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Benchmark Electronics, Inc. and Jabil Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

BHE vs. JBL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Benchmark Electronics, Inc. and Jabil Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

BHE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Benchmark Electronics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 78.30M and revenue of 755.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.4%.

JBL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a gross profit of 828.00M and revenue of 8.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.5%.

BHE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Benchmark Electronics, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.25M and revenue of 755.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.

JBL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jabil Inc. reported an operating income of 445.00M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.1%.

BHE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Benchmark Electronics, Inc. reported a net income of 19.88M and revenue of 755.98M, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

JBL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Jabil Inc. reported a net income of 275.00M and revenue of 8.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BHE and JBL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHE has higher volatility (17.80%) compared to JBL (16.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHE dropped -75.48% vs JBL's -94.92%.

BHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHE and JBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer