PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHBFX vs. RIDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHBFX achieves a 8.61% return, which is significantly higher than RIDAX's 5.31% return. Over the past 10 years, BHBFX has outperformed RIDAX with an annualized return of 9.97%, while RIDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.72% annualized return.


BHBFX

1D
0.34%
1M
-0.49%
YTD
8.61%
6M
8.10%
1Y
14.14%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
9.97%

RIDAX

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.86%
YTD
5.31%
6M
5.02%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
7.03%
10Y*
7.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHBFX
Madison Dividend Income Fund
8.61%8.19%7.62%1.76%-5.50%22.82%6.34%25.17%-0.81%19.94%
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
5.31%16.83%9.49%6.16%-7.14%16.47%3.68%17.57%-6.06%11.86%

Correlation

The correlation between BHBFX and RIDAX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003

0.89

The correlation between BHBFX and RIDAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHBFX vs. RIDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHBFX
BHBFX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BHBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BHBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

RIDAX
RIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
RIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHBFXRIDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.22

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.48

7.99

-1.51

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the RIDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHBFX and RIDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHBFX drawdown since its inception was -34.07%, smaller than the maximum RIDAX drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHBFX and RIDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHBFXRIDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.07%

-42.37%

+8.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-6.13%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.32%

-8.71%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.80%

-16.28%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.34%

-26.22%

-6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-2.03%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.70%

-4.40%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

1.70%

+0.58%

Volatility

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Volatility Comparison

Madison Dividend Income Fund (BHBFX) has a higher volatility of 3.04% compared to The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX) at 2.25%. This indicates that BHBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHBFXRIDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

2.25%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.45%

5.80%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.25%

7.38%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.57%

9.49%

+6.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.36%

10.70%

+6.66%

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BHBFX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than RIDAX's 1.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

BHBFX vs. RIDAX - Dividend Comparison

BHBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.55%, more than RIDAX's 8.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BHBFX
Madison Dividend Income Fund
11.55%12.41%14.14%6.01%9.39%11.53%1.53%3.95%12.73%3.89%3.76%6.06%
RIDAX
The Income Fund of America Class R-1
8.81%9.24%5.14%2.38%6.20%5.92%2.09%4.25%6.58%3.68%2.32%4.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


BHBFX and RIDAX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BHBFX has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to RIDAX (2.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHBFX dropped -34.07% vs RIDAX's -42.37%.

RIDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHBFX and RIDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer