BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO
BGU.TO (Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF) and XUU.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BGU.TO is actively managed, while XUU.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGU.TO returned 9.27%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for XUU.TO. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGU.TO achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly lower than XUU.TO's 14.12% return.
BGU.TO
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 1Y
- 12.19%
- 3Y*
- 13.49%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- —
XUU.TO
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 14.12%
- 1Y
- 25.10%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.31%
BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGU.TO Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF | 7.16% | 4.62% | 18.85% | 20.28% | -13.23% | 30.22% | 8.27% | 30.25% | 2.31% |
XUU.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 14.12% | 11.25% | 34.07% | 23.11% | -13.53% | 25.94% | 16.26% | 23.78% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGU.TO and XUU.TO is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018 | 0.62 |
The correlation between BGU.TO and XUU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BGU.TO
XUU.TO
BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGU.TO | XUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.36 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 2.86 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 10.71 | -7.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGU.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.66%, which is greater than XUU.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGU.TO and XUU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGU.TO | XUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.66% | -28.22% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -8.80% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.03% | -19.70% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.46% | -23.40% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -0.89% | -1.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -4.12% | -1.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 2.35% | +1.63% |
Volatility
BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) at 3.19%. This indicates that BGU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGU.TO | XUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 3.19% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 9.92% | +0.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 12.66% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 15.56% | +0.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 16.58% | +1.77% |
Dividends
BGU.TO vs. XUU.TO - Dividend Comparison
BGU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGU.TO Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XUU.TO iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 1.22% | 1.38% | 1.01% | 1.33% | 1.68% | 1.74% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGU.TO and XUU.TO have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Bristol Gate and iShares.
Find the right allocation for BGU.TO and XUU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer