PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

BGU.TO (Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF) and XMS.TO (iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BGU.TO is actively managed, while XMS.TO is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BGU.TO returned 9.27%/yr vs 4.70%/yr for XMS.TO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGU.TO achieves a 7.16% return, which is significantly higher than XMS.TO's 2.38% return.

BGU.TO

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.99%
6M
3.59%
YTD
7.16%
1Y
12.19%
3Y*
13.49%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
—

XMS.TO

1D
0.44%
1M
1.93%
6M
2.91%
YTD
2.38%
1Y
2.59%
3Y*
8.27%
5Y*
4.70%
10Y*
7.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BGU.TO
Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF		7.16%4.62%18.85%20.28%-13.23%30.22%8.27%30.25%2.31%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.38%3.74%14.27%7.88%-11.12%21.05%1.86%25.99%1.33%

Correlation

The correlation between BGU.TO and XMS.TO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2018

0.42

The correlation between BGU.TO and XMS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF

iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

Often compared with XMS.TO:
XMS.TO vs. XMU.TOXMS.TO vs. VFV.TOXMS.TO vs. XDU.TOXMS.TO vs. VSP.TOXMS.TO vs. XUS.TOXMS.TO vs. SPYXMS.TO vs. ZSP.TO

Return for Risk

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
BGU.TO
BGU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BGU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BGU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
XMS.TO
XMS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

BGU.TOXMS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.94
0.21

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.41
0.36

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.05

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

0.26

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

0.61

+2.46

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the XMS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGU.TO and XMS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGU.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.66%, smaller than the maximum XMS.TO drawdown of -36.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGU.TO and XMS.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

BGU.TOXMS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.66%

-36.87%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-8.32%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.03%

-9.80%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

-19.06%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-36.87%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-2.06%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-4.44%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

3.57%

+0.41%

Volatility

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF (BGU.TO) and iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XMS.TO) have volatilities of 3.40% and 3.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

BGU.TOXMS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

3.35%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

6.37%

+4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

10.25%

+2.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.01%

12.37%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.35%

15.23%

+3.12%

Dividends

BGU.TO vs. XMS.TO - Dividend Comparison

BGU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XMS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BGU.TO
Bristol Gate Concentrated US Equity ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XMS.TO
iShares MSCI Min Vol USA Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		1.19%1.10%1.24%1.41%1.22%1.02%1.71%1.44%1.58%2.02%0.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

BGU.TO and XMS.TO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: Bristol Gate and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGU.TO and XMS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer