BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO
BGIN.NEO (BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series) and ZXLK.TO (BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from BMO. BGIN.NEO is actively managed, while ZXLK.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, BGIN.NEO returned 84.48% vs 58.56% for ZXLK.TO. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGIN.NEO charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ZXLK.TO.
Performance
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGIN.NEO achieves a 51.05% return, which is significantly higher than ZXLK.TO's 35.97% return.
BGIN.NEO
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 17.03%
- YTD
- 51.05%
- 6M
- 49.76%
- 1Y
- 84.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZXLK.TO
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 19.80%
- YTD
- 35.97%
- 6M
- 26.70%
- 1Y
- 58.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 51.05% | 12.08% |
ZXLK.TO BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF | 35.97% | 19.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGIN.NEO and ZXLK.TO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between BGIN.NEO and ZXLK.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BGIN.NEO
ZXLK.TO
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) and BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGIN.NEO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.49 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.42 | 2.81 | +3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.31 | 7.55 | +12.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGIN.NEO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26 | 2.77 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 1.53 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGIN.NEO drawdown since its inception was -29.19%, which is greater than ZXLK.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIN.NEO and ZXLK.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGIN.NEO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.19% | -22.20% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.23% | -20.93% | +7.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -1.37% | -0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -5.69% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 7.78% | -3.61% |
Volatility
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO - Volatility Comparison
BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) has a higher volatility of 9.75% compared to BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.TO) at 7.33%. This indicates that BGIN.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZXLK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGIN.NEO | ZXLK.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.75% | 7.33% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.54% | 17.17% | +4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.04% | 21.26% | +4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 28.94% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 28.94% | -2.82% |
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGIN.NEO has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ZXLK.TO's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGIN.NEO vs. ZXLK.TO - Dividend Comparison
BGIN.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than ZXLK.TO's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series | 0.20% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.12% |
ZXLK.TO BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGIN.NEO and ZXLK.TO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZXLK.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZXLK.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.
Their fees differ too: 1.07% for BGIN.NEO and 0.21% for ZXLK.TO.
Find the right allocation for BGIN.NEO and ZXLK.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer