BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) and iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO).
BGIE.TO and XWD.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BGIE.TO is an actively managed fund by Brompton. It was launched on Apr 30, 2020. XWD.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. It was launched on Jun 18, 2009.
Performance
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 7.87% | 21.56% | 24.37% | 5.45% | -2.37% | 18.61% | 10.30% |
XWD.TO iShares MSCI World Index ETF | -1.72% | 15.25% | 28.07% | 20.32% | -11.57% | 21.87% | 20.02% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGIE.TO achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly higher than XWD.TO's -1.72% return.
BGIE.TO
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- 7.87%
- 6M
- 6.78%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 20.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- —
XWD.TO
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- YTD
- -1.72%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 14.90%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- 12.26%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGIE.TO has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XWD.TO's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BGIE.TO
XWD.TO
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) and iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGIE.TO | XWD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 0.87 | +0.84 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.24 | 1.28 | +0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 1.29 | +1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | 5.51 | +4.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGIE.TO | XWD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 0.87 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.91 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.85 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGIE.TO and XWD.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO - Dividend Comparison
BGIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than XWD.TO's 1.35% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGIE.TO Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF | 4.45% | 4.95% | 4.89% | 5.19% | 4.79% | 4.10% | 3.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XWD.TO iShares MSCI World Index ETF | 1.35% | 1.33% | 1.19% | 1.39% | 1.36% | 1.21% | 1.06% | 1.77% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 1.83% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGIE.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.24%, smaller than the maximum XWD.TO drawdown of -27.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGIE.TO and XWD.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGIE.TO | XWD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.24% | -27.48% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -12.14% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.24% | -21.40% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.75% | -5.05% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -3.52% | -1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.84% | -0.14% |
Volatility
BGIE.TO vs. XWD.TO - Volatility Comparison
Brompton Global Infrastructure ETF (BGIE.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.06% compared to iShares MSCI World Index ETF (XWD.TO) at 5.62%. This indicates that BGIE.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XWD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGIE.TO | XWD.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.06% | 5.62% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.55% | 9.28% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.56% | 17.14% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 13.66% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 15.34% | -0.09% |