PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGH vs. BBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGH vs. BBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGH achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly higher than BBDC's -6.34% return.


BGH

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-4.14%
1Y
1.91%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
6.49%
10Y*
7.57%

BBDC

1D
-0.61%
1M
-2.03%
YTD
-6.34%
6M
-2.84%
1Y
1.14%
3Y*
14.62%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGH vs. BBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BGH
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
-2.67%8.56%27.22%18.18%-19.89%24.10%-4.54%21.53%-11.33%
BBDC
Barings BDC, Inc.
-6.34%8.84%23.86%18.53%-18.59%29.31%-3.48%20.40%-9.56%

Correlation

The correlation between BGH and BBDC is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2018

0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGH vs. BBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGH
BGH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BGH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BGH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGH Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BBDC
BBDC Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
BBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGH vs. BBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) and Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGHBBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.03

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

0.09

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.23

0.20

+0.03

BGH vs. BBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGH Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is higher than the BBDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGH and BBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGH vs. BBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGH drawdown since its inception was -48.73%, roughly equal to the maximum BBDC drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGH and BBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGHBBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.73%

-48.45%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.90%

-12.28%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.90%

-24.51%

+7.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-27.55%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.25%

-9.77%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-7.98%

+0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.31%

5.75%

+2.56%

Volatility

BGH vs. BBDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund (BGH) is 2.26%, while Barings BDC, Inc. (BBDC) has a volatility of 6.63%. This indicates that BGH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGHBBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

6.63%

-4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.94%

15.41%

-7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

18.85%

-7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.25%

19.45%

-6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.95%

24.20%

-8.25%

Dividends

BGH vs. BBDC - Dividend Comparison

BGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.31%, less than BBDC's 13.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBDC
Barings BDC, Inc.
13.47%12.96%10.87%11.89%11.66%7.44%7.07%5.25%21.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BGH
Barings Global Short Duration High Yield Fund
12.31%11.38%9.72%10.66%9.99%7.31%9.10%10.14%12.11%9.50%9.61%13.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGH and BBDC have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBDC has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to BGH (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGH dropped -48.73% vs BBDC's -48.45%.

BGH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGH and BBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer