BGGSX vs. GXXIX
BGGSX (Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund) and GXXIX (abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BGGSX returned -4.49%/yr vs 10.32%/yr for GXXIX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGGSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GXXIX.
Performance
BGGSX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGGSX achieves a -2.13% return, which is significantly lower than GXXIX's 4.34% return.
BGGSX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- 6M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- -2.13%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.39%
- 5Y*
- -4.49%
- 10Y*
- —
GXXIX
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 4.34%
- 1Y
- 8.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 14.22%
BGGSX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | -2.13% | 10.25% | 30.44% | 45.93% | -52.50% | -11.13% | 125.42% | 30.00% | 8.31% | 16.54% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 4.34% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 12.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGSX and GXXIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between BGGSX and GXXIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGSX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGGSX
GXXIX
BGGSX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGGSX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.12 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 0.69 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 2.53 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGGSX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGSX drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than GXXIX's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGSX and GXXIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGSX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -33.65% | -35.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.08% | -11.78% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.87% | -19.74% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.71% | -33.65% | -34.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.46% | -2.57% | -25.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.22% | -6.13% | -19.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.76% | 3.21% | +9.55% |
Volatility
BGGSX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison
Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 3.46%. This indicates that BGGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGSX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 3.46% | +3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.75% | 10.32% | +7.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.52% | 12.61% | +9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.26% | 27.84% | +7.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.10% | 23.69% | +8.41% |
BGGSX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGSX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison
BGGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.38% | 2.61% | 3.29% | 1.35% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.20% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGSX and GXXIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGGSX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to GXXIX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGGSX dropped -68.76% vs GXXIX's -33.65%.
GXXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGGSX and GXXIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer