BGGSX vs. CHASX
BGGSX (Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund) and CHASX (Chase Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, BGGSX returned -5.28%/yr vs 22.34%/yr for CHASX. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGGSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for CHASX.
Performance
BGGSX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGGSX achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 24.43% return.
BGGSX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- -6.31%
- 6M
- -5.37%
- 1Y
- -3.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.60%
- 5Y*
- -5.28%
- 10Y*
- —
CHASX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 24.43%
- 6M
- 28.66%
- 1Y
- 49.45%
- 3Y*
- 40.34%
- 5Y*
- 22.34%
- 10Y*
- 20.36%
BGGSX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | -6.31% | 10.25% | 30.44% | 45.93% | -52.50% | -11.13% | 125.42% | 30.00% | 8.31% | 16.54% |
CHASX Chase Growth Fund | 24.43% | 20.61% | 64.71% | 25.91% | -20.41% | 22.32% | 18.27% | 42.63% | -3.96% | 14.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGGSX and CHASX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between BGGSX and CHASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGGSX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank
BGGSX
CHASX
BGGSX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGGSX | CHASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.46 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 4.98 | -5.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | 20.62 | -21.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGGSX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGGSX drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGSX and CHASX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGGSX | CHASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.76% | -45.94% | -22.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.08% | -9.90% | -16.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.87% | -23.40% | -7.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.71% | -24.63% | -43.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.52% | -1.90% | -29.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.19% | -9.14% | -16.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.23% | 2.38% | +9.85% |
Volatility
BGGSX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison
Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) at 6.96%. This indicates that BGGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGGSX | CHASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.87% | 6.96% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 14.37% | +2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.18% | 18.24% | +3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.23% | 20.38% | +14.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.16% | 19.96% | +12.20% |
BGGSX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGGSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGGSX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison
BGGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGGSX Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.38% | 2.61% | 3.29% | 1.35% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CHASX Chase Growth Fund | 7.33% | 9.12% | 36.67% | 5.80% | 5.49% | 20.15% | 7.83% | 22.82% | 12.92% | 11.92% | 9.14% | 10.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGGSX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGGSX has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to CHASX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGGSX dropped -68.76% vs CHASX's -45.94%.
CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGGSX and CHASX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer