PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGGSX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGGSX achieves a -6.31% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 24.43% return.


BGGSX

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.12%
YTD
-6.31%
6M
-5.37%
1Y
-3.80%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
-5.28%
10Y*

CHASX

1D
-0.86%
1M
4.74%
YTD
24.43%
6M
28.66%
1Y
49.45%
3Y*
40.34%
5Y*
22.34%
10Y*
20.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGGSX
Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund
-6.31%10.25%30.44%45.93%-52.50%-11.13%125.42%30.00%8.31%16.54%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
24.43%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%14.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BGGSX and CHASX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2017

0.73

The correlation between BGGSX and CHASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGGSX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGGSX
BGGSX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BGGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BGGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGGSXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.46

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

4.98

-5.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.38

20.62

-21.00

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGGSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGGSX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGGSX drawdown since its inception was -68.76%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGGSX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGGSXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.76%

-45.94%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.08%

-9.90%

-16.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.87%

-23.40%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.71%

-24.63%

-43.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.52%

-1.90%

-29.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.19%

-9.14%

-16.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.23%

2.38%

+9.85%

Volatility

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund (BGGSX) has a higher volatility of 7.87% compared to Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) at 6.96%. This indicates that BGGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGGSXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.87%

6.96%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.12%

14.37%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.18%

18.24%

+3.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.23%

20.38%

+14.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.16%

19.96%

+12.20%

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGGSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGGSX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

BGGSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CHASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGGSX
Baillie Gifford U.S. Equity Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%16.38%2.61%3.29%1.35%2.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.33%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGGSX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGGSX has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to CHASX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGGSX dropped -68.76% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGGSX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer