BGCIX vs. SCFZX
BGCIX (BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund) and SCFZX (PGIM Securitized Credit Fund) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, BGCIX returned 3.31%/yr vs 5.23%/yr for SCFZX. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BGCIX charges 1.12%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SCFZX.
Performance
BGCIX vs. SCFZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGCIX achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than SCFZX's 2.71% return.
BGCIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.93%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.64%
SCFZX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 2.71%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BGCIX vs. SCFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCIX BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund | 1.44% | 6.55% | 8.47% | 8.87% | -8.02% | 3.48% | 10.71% | 3.13% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 2.71% | 5.75% | 9.41% | 8.67% | -0.84% | 5.27% | -0.33% | 1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGCIX and SCFZX is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BGCIX and SCFZX has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGCIX vs. SCFZX — Risk / Return Rank
BGCIX
SCFZX
BGCIX vs. SCFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) and PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGCIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -14.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 7.19 | -5.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 19.16 | -15.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.87 | 67.68 | -54.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGCIX vs. SCFZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGCIX drawdown since its inception was -10.37%, smaller than the maximum SCFZX drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCIX and SCFZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGCIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.37% | -17.20% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -0.31% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.18% | -0.93% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.78% | -4.13% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | 0.00% | -0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.26% | -1.04% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 0.09% | +0.16% |
Volatility
BGCIX vs. SCFZX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund (BGCIX) has a higher volatility of 0.49% compared to PGIM Securitized Credit Fund (SCFZX) at 0.15%. This indicates that BGCIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGCIX | SCFZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | 0.15% | +0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.07% | 1.02% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36% | 1.47% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.91% | 1.91% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.14% | 3.31% | -0.17% |
BGCIX vs. SCFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGCIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SCFZX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGCIX vs. SCFZX - Dividend Comparison
BGCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%, more than SCFZX's 4.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCIX BlackRock Global Long/Short Credit Fund | 5.74% | 5.83% | 7.13% | 3.33% | 8.25% | 3.57% | 9.87% | 3.75% | 6.01% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 5.11% |
SCFZX PGIM Securitized Credit Fund | 4.61% | 5.25% | 6.55% | 5.58% | 4.97% | 2.56% | 3.08% | 2.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGCIX and SCFZX have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGCIX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to SCFZX (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGCIX dropped -10.37% vs SCFZX's -17.20%.
SCFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.00 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGCIX and SCFZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer