BGCG.L vs. FSV.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc (BGCG.L) and Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L).
Performance
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCG.L Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc | -2.11% | 39.75% | 13.68% | -26.27% | -25.62% | -28.59% | 56.04% | 20.35% | -11.07% | 20.34% |
FSV.L Fidelity Special Values | -1.44% | 37.21% | 15.72% | 3.44% | -4.97% | 26.66% | -9.74% | 25.12% | -9.15% | 13.94% |
Fundamentals
BGCG.L:
£21.58M
FSV.L:
£409.98M
BGCG.L:
£20.14M
FSV.L:
£254.11M
BGCG.L:
£41.22M
FSV.L:
£165.36M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGCG.L achieves a -2.11% return, which is significantly lower than FSV.L's -1.44% return. Over the past 10 years, BGCG.L has underperformed FSV.L with an annualized return of 4.37%, while FSV.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.12% annualized return.
BGCG.L
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -2.11%
- 6M
- -5.35%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 5.84%
- 5Y*
- -7.59%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
FSV.L
- 1D
- 2.62%
- 1M
- -8.65%
- YTD
- -1.44%
- 6M
- 5.05%
- 1Y
- 30.44%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L — Risk / Return Rank
BGCG.L
FSV.L
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc (BGCG.L) and Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGCG.L | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 1.93 | -1.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.01 | 2.55 | -1.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.37 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 2.19 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.03 | 9.28 | -6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGCG.L | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.93 | -1.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | 0.68 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 | 0.50 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.57 | -0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGCG.L and FSV.L is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Dividend Comparison
BGCG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than FSV.L's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCG.L Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc | 1.46% | 1.43% | 0.89% | 0.85% | 1.69% | 1.93% | 1.35% | 2.04% | 1.96% | 1.43% | 1.66% | 2.01% |
FSV.L Fidelity Special Values | 2.48% | 2.44% | 3.05% | 3.15% | 2.78% | 2.21% | 2.38% | 2.61% | 2.19% | 1.80% | 1.62% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGCG.L drawdown since its inception was -71.43%, which is greater than FSV.L's maximum drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCG.L and FSV.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGCG.L | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.43% | -51.87% | -19.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.79% | -14.02% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.14% | -25.22% | -38.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -71.43% | -51.87% | -19.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.76% | -10.43% | -39.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.65% | -8.51% | -17.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 3.30% | +1.43% |
Volatility
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc (BGCG.L) is 6.90%, while Fidelity Special Values (FSV.L) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that BGCG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGCG.L | FSV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 7.41% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.80% | 11.33% | +2.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.42% | 15.68% | +6.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.72% | 17.31% | +12.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 21.97% | +4.72% |
Financials
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc and Fidelity Special Values. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BGCG.L vs. FSV.L - Profitability Comparison
BGCG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc reported a gross profit of 22.70M and revenue of 22.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
FSV.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidelity Special Values reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 146.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BGCG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc reported an operating income of 21.80M and revenue of 22.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 96.1%.
FSV.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidelity Special Values reported an operating income of 142.74M and revenue of 146.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 97.2%.
BGCG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Baillie Gifford China Growth Trust plc reported a net income of 21.84M and revenue of 22.70M, resulting in a net margin of 96.2%.
FSV.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Fidelity Special Values reported a net income of 138.91M and revenue of 146.83M, resulting in a net margin of 94.6%.