BFGIX vs. CCSMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BFGIX (Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares) and CCSMX (Conestoga SMid Cap Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BFGIX returned 21.44%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for CCSMX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFGIX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CCSMX.

Performance

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX) and Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFGIX achieves a 3.92% return, which is significantly higher than CCSMX's -6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, BFGIX has outperformed CCSMX with an annualized return of 21.44%, while CCSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.55% annualized return.

BFGIX

• 1D: 2.36%
• 1M: 7.03%
• YTD: 3.92%
• 6M: 16.37%
• 1Y: 25.20%
• 3Y*: 21.80%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 21.44%

CCSMX

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: -6.32%
• 6M: -5.54%
• 1Y: -8.35%
• 3Y*: 2.52%
• 5Y*: -1.06%
• 10Y*: 9.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BFGIX Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares	3.92%	22.26%	29.85%	27.78%	-28.05%	19.00%	122.92%	30.34%	4.08%	26.58%
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	-6.32%	-5.91%	10.44%	25.77%	-29.47%	15.26%	28.44%	33.48%	-0.09%	34.11%

Correlation

The correlation between BFGIX and CCSMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2014	0.79

The correlation between BFGIX and CCSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BFGIX vs. CCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFGIX

BFGIX Risk / Return Rank: 31
BFGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
BFGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
BFGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
BFGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BFGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

CCSMX

CCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 1
CCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
CCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX) and Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BFGIX	CCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	-0.53	+1.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	-0.69	+3.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	0.93	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	-0.47	+3.06
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.04	-1.04	+8.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the CCSMX Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFGIX and CCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BFGIX	CCSMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	-0.53	+1.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	-0.05	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	0.47	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.36	+0.43

Drawdowns

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFGIX drawdown since its inception was -43.62%, which is greater than CCSMX's maximum drawdown of -37.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFGIX and CCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFGIX	CCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.62%	-37.34%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.69%	-18.40%	+8.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.97%	-25.00%	+4.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.71%	-37.34%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.62%	-37.34%	-6.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-19.92%	+19.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-10.21%	+2.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	8.32%	-4.75%

Volatility

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BFGIX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Conestoga SMid Cap Fund (CCSMX) at 4.31%. This indicates that BFGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFGIX	CCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	4.31%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.53%	12.01%	+3.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.00%	16.64%	+2.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.34%	20.47%	+1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.99%	20.39%	+3.60%

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFGIX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CCSMX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFGIX vs. CCSMX - Dividend Comparison

BFGIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BFGIX Baron Focused Growth Fund Institutional Shares	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.79%	15.01%	2.78%	1.74%	1.05%	2.07%	5.92%	6.01%
CCSMX Conestoga SMid Cap Fund	2.33%	2.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	1.04%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFGIX and CCSMX in my portfolio?

BFGIX and CCSMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFGIX or CCSMX?

BFGIX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to CCSMX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFGIX dropped -43.62% vs CCSMX's -37.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.