BFEB vs. XLRI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. BFEB is passively managed, while XLRI is actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.

Performance

BFEB vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly higher than XLRI's 6.71% return.

BFEB

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: —

XLRI

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 6.71%
• 6M: 7.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFEB vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	7.13%	6.73%
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	6.71%	-0.57%

Correlation

The correlation between BFEB and XLRI is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

BFEB vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFEB

BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 77
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

XLRI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFEB vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFEB	XLRI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	—	—

Drawdowns

BFEB vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and XLRI.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFEB	XLRI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.20%	-7.12%	-20.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-0.54%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-1.65%	-1.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.28%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFEB	XLRI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.75%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.34%	10.99%	-2.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.43%	10.99%	+0.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	10.99%	+3.26%

BFEB vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFEB vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.24%.

Position	TTM	2025
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	12.24%	6.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFEB and XLRI in my portfolio?

BFEB and XLRI have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFEB or XLRI?

On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFEB or XLRI?

XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFEB or XLRI?

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 12.24%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.

What is the main difference between BFEB and XLRI?

BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.35% for XLRI.