BFEB vs. LOUP
BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BFEB returned 11.70%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for LOUP. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
BFEB vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 28.21% return.
BFEB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 75.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
BFEB vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 8.25% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 10.17% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 28.21% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 74.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFEB and LOUP is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BFEB and LOUP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
BFEB vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BFEB
LOUP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
BFEB
LOUP
Financial Services
BFEB
LOUP
Communication Services
BFEB
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
BFEB
LOUP
Healthcare
BFEB
LOUP
Industrials
BFEB
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
BFEB
LOUP
-
Energy
BFEB
LOUP
Utilities
BFEB
LOUP
Real Estate
BFEB
LOUP
-
Basic Materials
BFEB
LOUP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFEB vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
BFEB
LOUP
BFEB vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFEB | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.41 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 3.61 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 12.23 | +4.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFEB | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.66 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 0.40 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.59 | +0.31 |
Drawdowns
BFEB vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFEB | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -58.68% | +32.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -21.00% | +14.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -35.23% | +21.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -55.63% | +40.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -1.87% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -20.04% | +17.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 6.19% | -4.94% |
Volatility
BFEB vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 1.51%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFEB | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 8.23% | -6.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.31% | 21.94% | -15.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 28.51% | -20.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 32.38% | -20.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 31.96% | -17.77% |
BFEB vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFEB vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFEB nor LOUP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFEB and LOUP have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to BFEB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs LOUP's -58.68%.
On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 12.98% vs 11.70% for BFEB. On fees, LOUP is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, BFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LOUP is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFEB.
BFEB and LOUP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while LOUP is Technology Equities. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.70% for LOUP.
LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFEB and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer