BFEB vs. IWMY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both Options Trading funds - BFEB tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series while IWMY tracks the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, BFEB returned 19.04% vs 21.86% for IWMY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.

Performance

BFEB vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 7.13% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 14.94% return.

BFEB

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: 6.83%
• 1Y: 19.04%
• 3Y*: 15.76%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: —

IWMY

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: 3.35%
• YTD: 14.94%
• 6M: 12.52%
• 1Y: 21.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFEB vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	7.13%	12.99%	17.58%	12.22%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	14.94%	10.18%	5.56%	10.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BFEB and IWMY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2023	0.73

The correlation between BFEB and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BFEB vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFEB

BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 77
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 81

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 39
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 36
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFEB vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFEB	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	1.34	+0.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	1.84	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.23	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	1.90	+1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.92	6.20	+8.73

BFEB vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFEB and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BFEB vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, which is greater than IWMY's maximum drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and IWMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFEB	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.20%	-18.72%	-8.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-11.57%	+5.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-0.81%	-0.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.77%	-2.94%	+0.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.28%	3.54%	-2.26%

Volatility

BFEB vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 2.70%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 6.20%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFEB	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	6.20%	-3.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.75%	13.55%	-6.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.34%	16.37%	-8.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.43%	15.95%	-4.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.25%	15.95%	-1.70%

BFEB vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFEB vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	43.75%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFEB and IWMY in my portfolio?

BFEB and IWMY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFEB or IWMY?

IWMY has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to BFEB (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -27.20% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, BFEB or IWMY?

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 21.86% vs 19.04% for BFEB. On fees, BFEB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BFEB has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFEB or IWMY?

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 21.86% return vs 19.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFEB or IWMY?

BFEB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFEB or IWMY?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 43.75%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.

What is the main difference between BFEB and IWMY?

BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while IWMY tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.99% for IWMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.