BFEB vs. BUFF
BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BFEB returned 11.70%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFEB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
BFEB vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
BFEB
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 8.25%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BFEB vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 8.25% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 10.17% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -9.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFEB and BUFF is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020 | 0.88 |
The correlation between BFEB and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BFEB vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BFEB
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BFEB
BUFF
Financial Services
BFEB
BUFF
Communication Services
BFEB
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
BFEB
BUFF
Healthcare
BFEB
BUFF
Industrials
BFEB
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
BFEB
BUFF
Energy
BFEB
BUFF
Utilities
BFEB
BUFF
Real Estate
BFEB
BUFF
Basic Materials
BFEB
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFEB vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
BFEB
BUFF
BFEB vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.58 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 4.02 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 21.50 | -4.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.80 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.49 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
BFEB vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -46.23% | +19.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -3.58% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -10.24% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -10.24% | -4.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | -0.27% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -6.18% | +3.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 0.67% | +0.58% |
Volatility
BFEB vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that BFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFEB | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.51% | 1.02% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.31% | 3.83% | +2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.10% | 5.15% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.39% | 8.41% | +2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 17.67% | -3.48% |
BFEB vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFEB vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFEB nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFEB and BUFF have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFEB has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.70% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, BFEB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BFEB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
BFEB and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFEB and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer