BFEB vs. BSEP
BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and BSEP (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September) are both exchange-traded funds - BFEB is a Options Trading fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while BSEP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BFEB returned 11.48%/yr vs 10.62%/yr for BSEP. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
BFEB vs. BSEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than BSEP's 6.02% return.
BFEB
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- —
BSEP
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 6.02%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.14%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
BFEB vs. BSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 7.14% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 6.01% |
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 6.02% | 14.80% | 16.96% | 20.94% | -9.20% | 14.64% | 12.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFEB and BSEP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2020 | 0.92 |
The correlation between BFEB and BSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
BFEB vs. BSEP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BFEB
BSEP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BFEB
BSEP
Financial Services
BFEB
BSEP
Communication Services
BFEB
BSEP
Consumer Cyclical
BFEB
BSEP
Healthcare
BFEB
BSEP
Industrials
BFEB
BSEP
Consumer Defensive
BFEB
BSEP
Energy
BFEB
BSEP
Utilities
BFEB
BSEP
Real Estate
BFEB
BSEP
Basic Materials
BFEB
BSEP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFEB vs. BSEP — Risk / Return Rank
BFEB
BSEP
BFEB vs. BSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFEB | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 3.30 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | 16.41 | -0.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFEB | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 2.41 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.92 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
BFEB vs. BSEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, which is greater than BSEP's maximum drawdown of -23.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and BSEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFEB | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -23.98% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.41% | -5.70% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.82% | -13.36% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -15.02% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -0.80% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -2.74% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.14% | +0.12% |
Volatility
BFEB vs. BSEP - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September (BSEP) at 1.26%. This indicates that BFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFEB | BSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.02% | 1.26% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.50% | 5.89% | +0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.21% | 7.81% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.41% | 11.62% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.19% | 13.76% | +0.43% |
BFEB vs. BSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BFEB and BSEP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
BFEB vs. BSEP - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFEB nor BSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSEP Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - September | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BFEB and BSEP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BFEB has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to BSEP (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs BSEP's -23.98%.
On 5-year performance, BFEB leads with 11.48% vs 10.62% for BSEP. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, BSEP has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 11.48% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BFEB and BSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
BFEB and BSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while BSEP is Defined Outcome. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while BSEP tracks S&P 500 Index.
BSEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFEB and BSEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer