BFEB vs. APRJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BFEB (Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February) and APRJ (Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds from Innovator. BFEB is passively managed, while APRJ is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BFEB returned 16.68%/yr vs 6.35%/yr for APRJ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

BFEB vs. APRJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly higher than APRJ's 3.18% return.

BFEB

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 2.99%
• YTD: 8.25%
• 6M: 9.24%
• 1Y: 21.21%
• 3Y*: 16.68%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

APRJ

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.70%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 3.64%
• 1Y: 6.91%
• 3Y*: 6.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFEB vs. APRJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	8.25%	12.99%	17.58%	14.15%
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April	3.18%	5.71%	6.24%	5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between BFEB and APRJ is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2023	0.53

The correlation between BFEB and APRJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

BFEB vs. APRJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BFEB	APRJ
Technology	36.2%	33.6%
Financial Services	11.9%	12.4%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.5%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.4%	9.5%
Industrials	8.1%	8.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.3%
Energy	3.5%	4.0%
Utilities	2.3%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.0%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.9%

Return for Risk

BFEB vs. APRJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFEB

BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 80
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

APRJ

APRJ Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
APRJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
APRJ Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
APRJ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFEB vs. APRJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BFEB	APRJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	4.63	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	9.47	-5.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	2.20	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	34.55	-31.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.95	103.47	-86.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BFEB vs. APRJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is lower than the APRJ Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFEB and APRJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BFEB	APRJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	4.63	-1.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.03	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	1.80	-0.90

Drawdowns

BFEB vs. APRJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, which is greater than APRJ's maximum drawdown of -4.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and APRJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFEB	APRJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.37%	-4.68%	-21.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.41%	-0.20%	-6.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.82%	-4.68%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.12%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.69%	-0.12%	-2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	0.07%	+1.18%

Volatility

BFEB vs. APRJ - Volatility Comparison

Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) has a higher volatility of 1.51% compared to Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April (APRJ) at 0.47%. This indicates that BFEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BFEB	APRJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.51%	0.47%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.31%	1.14%	+5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.10%	1.50%	+6.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.39%	3.63%	+7.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.19%	3.63%	+10.56%

BFEB vs. APRJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BFEB and APRJ have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

BFEB vs. APRJ - Dividend Comparison

BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
APRJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - April	5.27%	5.46%	5.88%	4.88%
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFEB and APRJ in my portfolio?

BFEB and APRJ have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BFEB or APRJ?

BFEB has higher volatility (1.51%) compared to APRJ (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs APRJ's -4.68%.

Which ETF is better, BFEB or APRJ?

On 3-year performance, BFEB leads with 16.68% vs 6.35% for APRJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, APRJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BFEB or APRJ?

Over the 3-year period, BFEB has performed better with a 16.68% return vs 6.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFEB or APRJ?

BFEB and APRJ have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFEB or APRJ?

APRJ has the higher dividend yield at 5.27%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.