PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFCAX vs. SIDCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFCAX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than SIDCX's 0.71% return.


BFCAX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.78%
YTD
0.46%
6M
0.18%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
4.31%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*

SIDCX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.86%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.55%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.14%
10Y*
2.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFCAX
American Funds Corporate Bond Fund
0.46%6.67%1.71%6.85%-16.51%-2.15%13.05%13.21%-2.50%5.61%
SIDCX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund
0.71%7.40%1.92%6.58%-15.78%-1.66%10.68%12.43%-1.61%5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between BFCAX and SIDCX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.95

The correlation between BFCAX and SIDCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFCAX vs. SIDCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFCAX
BFCAX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BFCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BFCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SIDCX
SIDCX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
SIDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
SIDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFCAXSIDCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.26

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.97

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.10

6.23

-1.13

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFCAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is comparable to the SIDCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFCAX and SIDCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFCAXSIDCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.02

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.41

-0.01

Drawdowns

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFCAX drawdown since its inception was -23.01%, which is greater than SIDCX's maximum drawdown of -21.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFCAX and SIDCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFCAXSIDCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.01%

-21.47%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-3.10%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.92%

-6.38%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-21.39%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.85%

-2.69%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.45%

-5.22%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.98%

+0.07%

Volatility

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds Corporate Bond Fund (BFCAX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX) have volatilities of 1.48% and 1.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFCAXSIDCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.48%

1.52%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

3.17%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.39%

4.29%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

6.42%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.99%

5.70%

+0.29%

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFCAX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SIDCX's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFCAX vs. SIDCX - Dividend Comparison

BFCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than SIDCX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFCAX
American Funds Corporate Bond Fund
4.19%4.20%4.06%2.82%1.95%1.50%4.43%3.44%2.63%2.68%0.00%0.00%
SIDCX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund
4.70%4.61%4.20%2.99%2.36%3.57%4.93%3.07%3.16%2.77%2.75%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, BFCAX and SIDCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SIDCX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to BFCAX (1.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFCAX dropped -23.01% vs SIDCX's -21.47%.

SIDCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFCAX and SIDCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer