PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEXIX vs. GTDDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Emerging Markets Fund (BEXIX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEXIX achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than GTDDX's 40.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BEXIX has underperformed GTDDX with an annualized return of 7.72%, while GTDDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.08% annualized return.


BEXIX

1D
0.45%
1M
-1.68%
6M
9.40%
YTD
16.15%
1Y
29.40%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
3.79%
10Y*
7.72%

GTDDX

1D
0.93%
1M
-1.75%
6M
34.08%
YTD
40.06%
1Y
61.15%
3Y*
21.56%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEXIX
Baron Emerging Markets Fund
16.15%30.11%7.91%8.29%-25.82%-6.06%29.71%18.85%-18.48%40.63%
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
40.06%29.88%-0.66%8.82%-17.70%-7.00%17.19%29.99%-18.77%30.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BEXIX and GTDDX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.86

The correlation between BEXIX and GTDDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEXIX vs. GTDDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEXIX
BEXIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BEXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BEXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

GTDDX
GTDDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GTDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GTDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Emerging Markets Fund (BEXIX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEXIXGTDDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.50

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

4.27

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.78

15.25

-8.47

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEXIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the GTDDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEXIX and GTDDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEXIX drawdown since its inception was -45.58%, smaller than the maximum GTDDX drawdown of -62.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEXIX and GTDDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEXIXGTDDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.58%

-62.89%

+17.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.32%

-14.49%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.63%

-16.08%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.19%

-34.92%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.58%

-39.58%

-6.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.13%

-6.60%

+0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-18.70%

+4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

4.04%

+0.16%

Volatility

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Volatility Comparison

Baron Emerging Markets Fund (BEXIX) and Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd (GTDDX) have volatilities of 11.20% and 10.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEXIXGTDDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.20%

10.88%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.30%

20.71%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.78%

22.62%

+0.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.31%

17.23%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

17.24%

+1.09%

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEXIX has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than GTDDX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEXIX vs. GTDDX - Dividend Comparison

BEXIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than GTDDX's 15.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEXIX
Baron Emerging Markets Fund
1.76%2.04%0.81%0.69%0.00%1.88%0.35%0.46%0.49%0.45%0.76%0.39%
GTDDX
Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap Fd
15.08%21.13%1.16%1.51%1.17%4.46%5.05%1.49%1.53%0.71%0.86%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEXIX and GTDDX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BEXIX has higher volatility (11.20%) compared to GTDDX (10.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEXIX dropped -45.58% vs GTDDX's -62.89%.

GTDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEXIX and GTDDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer