BEP vs. SHV
BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.) is a stock, while SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. Over the past 10 years, BEP returned 12.60%/yr vs 2.26%/yr for SHV. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
BEP vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEP achieves a 20.85% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BEP has outperformed SHV with an annualized return of 12.60%, while SHV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.26% annualized return.
BEP
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- 6M
- 18.78%
- YTD
- 20.85%
- 1Y
- 32.09%
- 3Y*
- 8.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
SHV
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
BEP vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 20.85% | 25.65% | -8.23% | 9.02% | -26.48% | -13.69% | 80.30% | 90.75% | -20.95% | 24.51% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.79% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEP and SHV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between BEP and SHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.09 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEP vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
BEP
SHV
BEP vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEP | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -17.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -90.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 30.49 | -29.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 140.72 | -138.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | 1,495.85 | -1,490.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEP vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEP drawdown since its inception was -53.85%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP and SHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEP | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -0.45% | -53.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.25% | -0.03% | -14.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.41% | -0.03% | -31.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.46% | -0.38% | -47.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.85% | -0.45% | -53.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.73% | -0.01% | -15.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -0.03% | -13.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.58% | 0.00% | +6.58% |
Volatility
BEP vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.08%. This indicates that BEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEP | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.32% | 0.08% | +6.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.60% | 0.14% | +19.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.90% | 0.21% | +28.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.99% | 0.29% | +30.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.01% | 0.28% | +29.73% |
Dividends
BEP vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
BEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.80%, more than SHV's 3.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 4.80% | 5.53% | 6.23% | 5.14% | 5.05% | 4.42% | 2.68% | 4.42% | 7.57% | 5.36% | 5.99% | 6.34% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.78% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEP and SHV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEP has higher volatility (6.32%) compared to SHV (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEP dropped -53.85% vs SHV's -0.45%.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.17 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEP and SHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer