BEP vs. GOF
BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.) is a stock, while GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Guggenheim. Over the past 10 years, BEP returned 12.55%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for GOF. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BEP vs. GOF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEP achieves a 21.57% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -7.57% return. Over the past 10 years, BEP has outperformed GOF with an annualized return of 12.55%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.48% annualized return.
BEP
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -9.05%
- 6M
- 16.27%
- YTD
- 21.57%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.86%
GOF
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- 6M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- -7.57%
- 1Y
- -14.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.30%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.90%
BEP vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 21.57% | 25.65% | -8.23% | 9.02% | -26.48% | -13.69% | 80.30% | 90.75% | -20.95% | 24.51% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -7.57% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEP and GOF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEP vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank
BEP
GOF
BEP vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEP | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.85 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | -0.63 | +2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | -1.07 | +4.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEP vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEP drawdown since its inception was -53.85%, roughly equal to the maximum GOF drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEP and GOF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEP | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.85% | -54.66% | +0.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.37% | -23.24% | +8.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.41% | -28.56% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.46% | -32.41% | -15.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.85% | -38.50% | -15.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.23% | -17.67% | +2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.60% | -7.12% | -6.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.85% | 13.68% | -6.83% |
Volatility
BEP vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. (BEP) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) at 3.07%. This indicates that BEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEP | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 3.07% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.25% | 10.60% | +8.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.28% | 18.18% | +10.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.00% | 18.18% | +12.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.02% | 19.53% | +10.49% |
Dividends
BEP vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison
BEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than GOF's 20.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEP Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. | 4.77% | 5.53% | 6.23% | 5.14% | 5.05% | 4.42% | 2.68% | 4.42% | 7.57% | 5.36% | 5.99% | 6.34% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 20.50% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEP and GOF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEP has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to GOF (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEP dropped -53.85% vs GOF's -54.66%.
BEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEP and GOF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer