PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BELFB vs. HYDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BELFB vs. HYDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) and Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BELFB achieves a 62.26% return, which is significantly higher than HYDR's 41.41% return.


BELFB

1D
-1.55%
1M
-8.96%
6M
42.65%
YTD
62.26%
1Y
180.31%
3Y*
68.56%
5Y*
85.24%
10Y*
32.06%

HYDR

1D
-2.19%
1M
-20.76%
6M
18.79%
YTD
41.41%
1Y
96.33%
3Y*
-1.45%
5Y*
-16.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BELFB vs. HYDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BELFB
Bel Fuse Inc.
62.26%106.32%24.03%104.19%158.73%-4.59%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
41.41%43.73%-33.08%-36.49%-47.24%-15.79%

Correlation

The correlation between BELFB and HYDR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BELFB vs. HYDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BELFB
BELFB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BELFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BELFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BELFB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
BELFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BELFB Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDR
HYDR Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HYDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDR Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BELFB vs. HYDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) and Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BELFBHYDRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.28

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.41

2.48

+4.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.56

6.07

+17.49

BELFB vs. HYDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BELFB Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the HYDR Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BELFB and HYDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BELFB vs. HYDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BELFB drawdown since its inception was -81.89%, smaller than the maximum HYDR drawdown of -89.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BELFB and HYDR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BELFBHYDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.89%

-89.28%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.47%

-39.03%

+14.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.49%

-70.32%

+33.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.49%

-89.28%

+52.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.41%

-67.53%

+50.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-64.13%

+27.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

15.93%

-8.24%

Volatility

BELFB vs. HYDR - Volatility Comparison

Bel Fuse Inc. (BELFB) has a higher volatility of 25.75% compared to Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) at 16.17%. This indicates that BELFB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BELFBHYDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.75%

16.17%

+9.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.90%

40.42%

+2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.97%

56.41%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.41%

47.71%

+4.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.76%

47.68%

+11.08%

Dividends

BELFB vs. HYDR - Dividend Comparison

BELFB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than HYDR's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BELFB
Bel Fuse Inc.
0.10%0.17%0.34%0.42%0.85%2.17%1.86%1.37%1.52%1.11%0.91%1.62%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
2.96%3.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BELFB and HYDR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BELFB has higher volatility (25.75%) compared to HYDR (16.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BELFB dropped -81.89% vs HYDR's -89.28%.

BELFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BELFB and HYDR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer