BEDZ vs. VICE

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BEDZ returned 10.99%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for VICE. Their 0.72 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

BEDZ vs. VICE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than VICE's 4.78% return.

BEDZ

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 14.32%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.14%

VICE

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.77%
• 6M: 2.71%
• YTD: 4.78%
• 1Y: -4.25%
• 3Y*: 5.90%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	$65.74K	$44.95K	$74.21K
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	$15.61K	$15.90K	$15.22K

BEDZ vs. VICE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	11.91%	3.46%	18.31%	23.88%	-13.40%	7.95%
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	4.78%	1.56%	18.27%	3.01%	-18.28%	-3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BEDZ and VICE is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between BEDZ and VICE has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

BEDZ vs. VICE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BEDZ	VICE
Real Estate	50.6%	6.3%
Consumer Cyclical	44.5%	45.3%
Industrials	4.1%	-
Communication Services	1.5%	7.2%
Basic Materials	-	5.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	31.2%
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Technology	-	4.7%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BEDZ vs. VICE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

VICE

VICE Risk / Return Rank: 6
VICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Omega Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEDZ vs. VICE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEDZ	VICE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	-0.37	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	-0.44	+1.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.95	+0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	-0.38	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	-0.63	+3.82

BEDZ vs. VICE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEDZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the VICE Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEDZ and VICE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEDZ vs. VICE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, smaller than the maximum VICE drawdown of -38.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and VICE.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDZ	VICE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.70%	-38.27%	+8.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-13.59%	+1.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.31%	-16.55%	-11.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	-29.92%	+0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-7.11%	+4.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-12.26%	+4.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	8.17%	-3.09%

Volatility

BEDZ vs. VICE - Volatility Comparison

AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) at 4.42%. This indicates that BEDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEDZ	VICE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	4.42%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	10.14%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.40%	13.83%	+6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.60%	17.57%	+7.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.66%	19.12%	+5.54%

BEDZ vs. VICE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BEDZ and VICE have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

BEDZ vs. VICE - Dividend Comparison

BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than VICE's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.06%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	0.75%	0.79%	1.46%	1.69%	0.96%	0.99%	0.00%	2.47%	1.72%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEDZ and VICE in my portfolio?

BEDZ and VICE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEDZ or VICE?

BEDZ has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to VICE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEDZ dropped -29.70% vs VICE's -38.27%.

Which ETF is better, BEDZ or VICE?

On 5-year performance, BEDZ leads with 10.99% vs 1.67% for VICE. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BEDZ or VICE?

Over the 5-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEDZ or VICE?

BEDZ and VICE have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEDZ or VICE?

BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.75% for VICE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.