BEDZ vs. HVAC
BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and HVAC (AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while HVAC is a Industrials Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BEDZ returned 24.44% vs 53.59% for HVAC. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEDZ charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for HVAC.
Performance
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly lower than HVAC's 33.33% return.
BEDZ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 24.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
HVAC
- 1D
- -4.46%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 33.33%
- 6M
- 29.69%
- 1Y
- 53.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 10.82% | 0.57% |
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF | 33.33% | 23.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDZ and HVAC is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between BEDZ and HVAC shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BEDZ
HVAC
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
BEDZ
HVAC
Real Estate
BEDZ
HVAC
Industrials
BEDZ
HVAC
Communication Services
BEDZ
HVAC
-
Basic Materials
BEDZ
-
HVAC
-
Consumer Defensive
BEDZ
-
HVAC
-
Energy
BEDZ
-
HVAC
-
Financial Services
BEDZ
-
HVAC
-
Healthcare
BEDZ
-
HVAC
-
Technology
BEDZ
-
HVAC
Utilities
BEDZ
-
HVAC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDZ vs. HVAC — Risk / Return Rank
BEDZ
HVAC
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDZ | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 3.63 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | 12.28 | -7.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than HVAC's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and HVAC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDZ | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -21.22% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | -14.83% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -4.46% | +3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -3.98% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 4.38% | +0.75% |
Volatility
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) is 4.98%, while AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) has a volatility of 12.39%. This indicates that BEDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HVAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDZ | HVAC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 12.39% | -7.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 24.48% | -9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 29.30% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 30.27% | -5.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 30.27% | -5.49% |
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than HVAC's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDZ vs. HVAC - Dividend Comparison
BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than HVAC's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.08% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDZ and HVAC have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HVAC has higher volatility (12.39%) compared to BEDZ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEDZ dropped -29.70% vs HVAC's -21.22%.
On 1-year performance, HVAC leads with 53.59% vs 24.44% for BEDZ. On fees, BEDZ is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BEDZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HVAC has performed better with a 53.59% return vs 24.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEDZ is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.
BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.15% for HVAC.
BEDZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while HVAC is Industrials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 1.00% for HVAC.
HVAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEDZ and HVAC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer