BEDZ vs. GXPD
BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. BEDZ is actively managed, while GXPD is passively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BEDZ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.
Performance
BEDZ vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 10.82% return, which is significantly higher than GXPD's -4.42% return.
BEDZ
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 9.56%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 24.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BEDZ vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 10.82% | 0.07% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -4.42% | 5.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDZ and GXPD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDZ vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank
BEDZ
GXPD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BEDZ vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDZ | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.78 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDZ vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and GXPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDZ | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -16.61% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.92% | -8.86% | +7.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.00% | -4.40% | -3.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | — | — |
Volatility
BEDZ vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDZ | GXPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.39% | 20.38% | +0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 20.38% | +4.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.78% | 20.38% | +4.40% |
BEDZ vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDZ vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison
BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, more than GXPD's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.08% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDZ and GXPD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.
BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.20% for GXPD.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 0.15% for GXPD.
Find the right allocation for BEDZ and GXPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer