BEDZ vs. GXPD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. BEDZ is actively managed, while GXPD is passively managed. Over the past year, BEDZ returned 18.93% vs 10.32% for GXPD. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BEDZ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPD.

Performance

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than GXPD's -0.23% return.

BEDZ

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 1.55%
• 6M: 14.32%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 18.93%
• 3Y*: 13.22%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.14%

GXPD

• 1D: 5.81%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: -1.81%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 1Y: 10.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	$65.74K	$44.95K	$74.21K
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF	$4.13M	$2.16M	$1.71M

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	11.91%	0.07%
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF	-0.23%	5.36%

Correlation

The correlation between BEDZ and GXPD is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025	0.57

The correlation between BEDZ and GXPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BEDZ vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEDZ

BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 34
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33

GXPD

GXPD Risk / Return Rank: 18
GXPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GXPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
GXPD Omega Ratio Rank: 18
GXPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
GXPD Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEDZ	GXPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	0.30	+0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	0.58	+0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.07	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.34	0.40	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.19	1.07	+2.11

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEDZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the GXPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEDZ and GXPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and GXPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEDZ	GXPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.70%	-16.61%	-13.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.06%	-16.61%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.43%	-4.86%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.89%	-4.71%	-3.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.08%	6.15%	-1.07%

Volatility

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) is 5.40%, while Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that BEDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GXPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEDZ	GXPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	9.09%	-3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.18%	16.76%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.40%	21.74%	-1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.60%	21.56%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.66%	21.56%	+3.10%

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEDZ vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison

BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, more than GXPD's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF	2.06%	2.31%	0.00%	1.67%	0.21%	0.36%
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF	0.34%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEDZ and GXPD in my portfolio?

BEDZ and GXPD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEDZ or GXPD?

GXPD has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to BEDZ (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEDZ dropped -29.70% vs GXPD's -16.61%.

Which ETF is better, BEDZ or GXPD?

On 1-year performance, BEDZ leads with 18.93% vs 10.32% for GXPD. On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, BEDZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BEDZ or GXPD?

Over the 1-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 18.93% return vs 10.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEDZ or GXPD?

GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEDZ or GXPD?

BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.34% for GXPD.

What is the main difference between BEDZ and GXPD?

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 0.15% for GXPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.