BEDZ vs. FTGC
BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - BEDZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, BEDZ returned 8.86%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for FTGC. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BEDZ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FTGC.
Performance
BEDZ vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 20.23% return.
BEDZ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 9.40%
- YTD
- 10.65%
- 6M
- 7.48%
- 1Y
- 25.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.24%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
BEDZ vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 10.65% | 3.46% | 18.31% | 23.88% | -13.40% | 7.95% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 20.23% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 13.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDZ and FTGC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BEDZ and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDZ vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
BEDZ
FTGC
BEDZ vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDZ | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.09 | 2.74 | -0.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.91 | 9.43 | -4.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDZ vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDZ | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -59.47% | +29.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | -9.84% | -2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.31% | -10.39% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | -22.64% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -9.84% | +8.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -27.34% | +19.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.13% | 2.98% | +2.15% |
Volatility
BEDZ vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 2.99%. This indicates that BEDZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDZ | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 2.99% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.25% | 13.17% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.43% | 15.69% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.89% | 15.86% | +9.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.79% | 14.71% | +10.08% |
BEDZ vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDZ vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than FTGC's 15.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.09% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.95% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDZ and FTGC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BEDZ has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to FTGC (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEDZ dropped -29.70% vs FTGC's -59.47%.
On 5-year performance, FTGC leads with 12.56% vs 8.86% for BEDZ. On fees, FTGC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 12.56% return vs 8.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTGC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.95%, compared with 2.09% for BEDZ.
BEDZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 0.95% for FTGC.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEDZ and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer