BEDZ vs. DVXY
BEDZ (AdvisorShares Hotel ETF) and DVXY (WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. BEDZ is actively managed, while DVXY is passively managed. Over the past year, BEDZ returned 18.93% vs -3.16% for DVXY. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BEDZ charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXY.
Performance
BEDZ vs. DVXY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than DVXY's -12.70% return.
BEDZ
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- YTD
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 18.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.14%
DVXY
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -12.70%
- 1Y
- -3.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $65.74K | $44.95K | $74.21K | |
| $169.08 | $603.38 | $908.50 |
BEDZ vs. DVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 11.91% | 0.07% |
DVXY WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF | -12.70% | 1.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEDZ and DVXY is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.64 |
The correlation between BEDZ and DVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEDZ vs. DVXY — Risk / Return Rank
BEDZ
DVXY
BEDZ vs. DVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF (DVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEDZ | DVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.98 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.34 | -0.31 | +1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.19 | -0.64 | +3.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEDZ vs. DVXY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than DVXY's maximum drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and DVXY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEDZ | DVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.70% | -24.30% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.06% | -24.30% | +12.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.43% | -18.78% | +16.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -9.36% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 11.68% | -6.60% |
Volatility
BEDZ vs. DVXY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) is 5.40%, while WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF (DVXY) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that BEDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEDZ | DVXY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 9.20% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.18% | 20.04% | -4.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.40% | 27.36% | -6.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 27.32% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 27.32% | -2.66% |
BEDZ vs. DVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DVXY's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEDZ vs. DVXY - Dividend Comparison
BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, while DVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEDZ AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | 2.06% | 2.31% | 0.00% | 1.67% | 0.21% | 0.36% |
DVXY WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEDZ and DVXY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DVXY has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to BEDZ (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEDZ dropped -29.70% vs DVXY's -24.30%.
On 1-year performance, BEDZ leads with 18.93% vs -3.16% for DVXY. On fees, DVXY is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, BEDZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 18.93% return vs -3.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DVXY is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.
BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for DVXY.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 0.89% for DVXY.
BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEDZ and DVXY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer