PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEDZ vs. DVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF (DVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEDZ achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than DVXY's -12.70% return.


BEDZ

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.55%
6M
14.32%
YTD
11.91%
1Y
18.93%
3Y*
13.22%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.14%

DVXY

1D
3.83%
1M
-3.09%
6M
-14.07%
YTD
-12.70%
1Y
-3.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.74K$44.95K$74.21K
$169.08$603.38$908.50

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BEDZ and DVXY is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025

0.64

The correlation between BEDZ and DVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEDZ vs. DVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEDZ
BEDZ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
BEDZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEDZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEDZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BEDZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEDZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DVXY
DVXY Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
DVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
DVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) and WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF (DVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BEDZDVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.98

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

-0.31

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

-0.64

+3.82

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEDZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the DVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEDZ and DVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEDZ drawdown since its inception was -29.70%, which is greater than DVXY's maximum drawdown of -24.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEDZ and DVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEDZDVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.70%

-24.30%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.06%

-24.30%

+12.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-18.78%

+16.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-9.36%

+1.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

11.68%

-6.60%

Volatility

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Hotel ETF (BEDZ) is 5.40%, while WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF (DVXY) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that BEDZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEDZDVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

9.20%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.18%

20.04%

-4.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.40%

27.36%

-6.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.60%

27.32%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.66%

27.32%

-2.66%

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEDZ has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than DVXY's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEDZ vs. DVXY - Dividend Comparison

BEDZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, while DVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BEDZ
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
2.06%2.31%0.00%1.67%0.21%0.36%
DVXY
WEBs Consumer Discretionary XLY Defined Volatility ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEDZ and DVXY have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVXY has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to BEDZ (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEDZ dropped -29.70% vs DVXY's -24.30%.

On 1-year performance, BEDZ leads with 18.93% vs -3.16% for DVXY. On fees, DVXY is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, BEDZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BEDZ has performed better with a 18.93% return vs -3.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DVXY is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEDZ.

BEDZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.06%, compared with 0.00% for DVXY.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEDZ and 0.89% for DVXY.

BEDZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEDZ and DVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer