PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEARX vs. UHPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEARX achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly lower than UHPIX's 18.01% return. Over the past 10 years, BEARX has outperformed UHPIX with an annualized return of -14.66%, while UHPIX has yielded a comparatively lower -31.72% annualized return.


BEARX

1D
-0.29%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-9.50%
6M
-9.81%
1Y
-19.70%
3Y*
-16.79%
5Y*
-12.48%
10Y*
-14.66%

UHPIX

1D
-4.60%
1M
3.32%
YTD
18.01%
6M
23.79%
1Y
-11.88%
3Y*
-31.74%
5Y*
-26.86%
10Y*
-31.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
-9.50%-12.42%-20.34%-18.67%17.78%-23.78%-22.95%-19.95%-5.96%-15.76%
UHPIX
ProFunds UltraShort China
18.01%-49.82%-29.87%-26.13%-63.62%94.89%-64.76%-43.34%39.47%-57.67%

Correlation

The correlation between BEARX and UHPIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2008

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between BEARX and UHPIX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEARX vs. UHPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEARX
BEARX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

UHPIX
UHPIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UHPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UHPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BEARXUHPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.70

1.00

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

-0.29

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.89

-0.51

-1.38

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEARX Sharpe Ratio is -1.75, which is lower than the UHPIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEARX and UHPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BEARXUHPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.75

-0.26

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.74

-0.33

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.88

-0.14

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

-0.18

+0.16

Drawdowns

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEARX drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, roughly equal to the maximum UHPIX drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEARX and UHPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEARXUHPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.75%

-99.98%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.52%

-46.98%

+27.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.46%

-80.96%

+36.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.48%

-96.64%

+44.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.48%

-98.81%

+18.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.75%

-99.96%

+4.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.04%

-93.42%

+32.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.45%

26.52%

-16.07%

Volatility

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) is 2.86%, while ProFunds UltraShort China (UHPIX) has a volatility of 19.09%. This indicates that BEARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEARXUHPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

19.09%

-16.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

37.51%

-28.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.32%

52.53%

-41.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

82.92%

-65.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

228.53%

-211.86%

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BEARX and UHPIX have an expense ratio of 1.78%.


Dividends

BEARX vs. UHPIX - Dividend Comparison

BEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%, more than UHPIX's 3.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
7.42%6.71%0.00%13.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%
UHPIX
ProFunds UltraShort China
3.64%4.29%0.00%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEARX and UHPIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UHPIX has higher volatility (19.09%) compared to BEARX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEARX dropped -95.75% vs UHPIX's -99.98%.

UHPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.26 vs -1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEARX and UHPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer