BEARX vs. QISGX
BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) and QISGX (Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - BEARX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Federated, while QISGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, BEARX returned -14.61%/yr vs 13.48%/yr for QISGX. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. BEARX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QISGX.
Performance
BEARX vs. QISGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEARX achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than QISGX's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BEARX has underperformed QISGX with an annualized return of -14.61%, while QISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.
BEARX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 6M
- -9.06%
- 1Y
- -18.52%
- 3Y*
- -16.62%
- 5Y*
- -12.25%
- 10Y*
- -14.61%
QISGX
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 17.51%
- 6M
- 17.13%
- 1Y
- 42.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.67%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.48%
BEARX vs. QISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | -8.97% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -22.95% | -19.95% | -5.96% | -15.76% |
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 17.51% | 17.72% | 15.63% | 19.63% | -27.94% | 18.14% | 29.91% | 21.14% | -6.33% | 25.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEARX and QISGX is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006 | -0.81 |
The correlation between BEARX and QISGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEARX vs. QISGX — Risk / Return Rank
BEARX
QISGX
BEARX vs. QISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BEARX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.42 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 3.40 | -4.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.86 | 12.74 | -14.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BEARX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.70 | 2.19 | -3.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 | 0.36 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.88 | 0.55 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.39 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
BEARX vs. QISGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEARX drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, which is greater than QISGX's maximum drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEARX and QISGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEARX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.75% | -60.75% | -35.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.52% | -13.23% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.46% | -27.28% | -17.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.48% | -38.60% | -13.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.48% | -45.08% | -35.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.72% | -1.53% | -94.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.05% | -13.88% | -47.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.52% | 3.53% | +6.99% |
Volatility
BEARX vs. QISGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) is 2.87%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that BEARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEARX | QISGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.87% | 6.22% | -3.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 15.83% | -7.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.34% | 20.54% | -9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 24.48% | -7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.67% | 24.69% | -8.02% |
BEARX vs. QISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEARX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than QISGX's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEARX vs. QISGX - Dividend Comparison
BEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than QISGX's 3.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 7.37% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QISGX Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund | 3.33% | 3.91% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 3.63% | 29.34% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 7.03% | 5.09% | 1.61% | 18.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEARX and QISGX have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QISGX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to BEARX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEARX dropped -95.75% vs QISGX's -60.75%.
QISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEARX and QISGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer