PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEARX vs. QISGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BEARX vs. QISGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEARX achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than QISGX's 17.51% return. Over the past 10 years, BEARX has underperformed QISGX with an annualized return of -14.61%, while QISGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.48% annualized return.


BEARX

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.43%
YTD
-8.97%
6M
-9.06%
1Y
-18.52%
3Y*
-16.62%
5Y*
-12.25%
10Y*
-14.61%

QISGX

1D
-1.27%
1M
1.44%
YTD
17.51%
6M
17.13%
1Y
42.60%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEARX vs. QISGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
-8.97%-12.42%-20.34%-18.67%17.78%-23.78%-22.95%-19.95%-5.96%-15.76%
QISGX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund
17.51%17.72%15.63%19.63%-27.94%18.14%29.91%21.14%-6.33%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BEARX and QISGX is -0.73, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

-0.81

The correlation between BEARX and QISGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.81 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BEARX vs. QISGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEARX
BEARX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BEARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEARX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BEARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEARX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

QISGX
QISGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QISGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QISGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QISGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QISGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QISGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEARX vs. QISGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BEARXQISGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.71

1.42

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.99

3.40

-4.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.86

12.74

-14.60

BEARX vs. QISGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEARX Sharpe Ratio is -1.70, which is lower than the QISGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEARX and QISGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BEARXQISGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.70

2.19

-3.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.72

0.36

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.88

0.55

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

0.39

-0.41

Drawdowns

BEARX vs. QISGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEARX drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, which is greater than QISGX's maximum drawdown of -60.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEARX and QISGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BEARXQISGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.75%

-60.75%

-35.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.52%

-13.23%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.46%

-27.28%

-17.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.48%

-38.60%

-13.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.48%

-45.08%

-35.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.72%

-1.53%

-94.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.05%

-13.88%

-47.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.52%

3.53%

+6.99%

Volatility

BEARX vs. QISGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) is 2.87%, while Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund (QISGX) has a volatility of 6.22%. This indicates that BEARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QISGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BEARXQISGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

6.22%

-3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

15.83%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

20.54%

-9.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.97%

24.48%

-7.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

24.69%

-8.02%

BEARX vs. QISGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEARX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than QISGX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

BEARX vs. QISGX - Dividend Comparison

BEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than QISGX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BEARX
Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd
7.37%6.71%0.00%13.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QISGX
Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Growth Fund
3.33%3.91%0.00%0.05%3.63%29.34%0.45%0.00%7.03%5.09%1.61%18.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BEARX and QISGX have a correlation of -0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QISGX has higher volatility (6.22%) compared to BEARX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEARX dropped -95.75% vs QISGX's -60.75%.

QISGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BEARX and QISGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer