BEARX vs. FHUMX
BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) and FHUMX (Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund) are both mutual funds - BEARX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Federated, while FHUMX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 5 years, BEARX returned -11.62%/yr vs 6.17%/yr for FHUMX. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. BEARX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FHUMX.
Performance
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEARX achieves a -7.92% return, which is significantly lower than FHUMX's 11.78% return.
BEARX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- -6.93%
- YTD
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -13.95%
- 3Y*
- -14.69%
- 5Y*
- -11.62%
- 10Y*
- -14.33%
FHUMX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 11.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- —
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | -7.92% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -19.71% |
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 11.78% | -1.38% | 9.90% | 21.92% | -16.51% | 22.94% | 27.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEARX and FHUMX is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | -0.72 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BEARX and FHUMX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.72 to -0.37, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEARX vs. FHUMX — Risk / Return Rank
BEARX
FHUMX
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEARX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.12 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 1.19 | -2.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.70 | 3.39 | -5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEARX drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, which is greater than FHUMX's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEARX and FHUMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEARX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.75% | -29.48% | -66.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.55% | -11.58% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.46% | -29.48% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.48% | -29.48% | -23.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.67% | -5.35% | -90.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.17% | -8.09% | -53.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 3.92% | +4.52% |
Volatility
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) is 3.78%, while Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that BEARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHUMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEARX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 7.54% | -3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.21% | 16.77% | -6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.50% | 21.43% | -8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 21.60% | -4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 21.24% | -4.55% |
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEARX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FHUMX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Dividend Comparison
BEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, less than FHUMX's 7.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 7.29% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% |
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 7.65% | 8.56% | 0.93% | 4.41% | 2.77% | 4.05% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEARX and FHUMX have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHUMX has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to BEARX (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEARX dropped -95.75% vs FHUMX's -29.48%.
FHUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEARX and FHUMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer