BEARX vs. FHUMX
BEARX (Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd) and FHUMX (Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund) are both mutual funds - BEARX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by Federated, while FHUMX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 5 years, BEARX returned -11.45%/yr vs 6.01%/yr for FHUMX. At a correlation of -0.72, they often move in opposite directions. BEARX charges 1.78%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FHUMX.
Performance
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEARX achieves a -6.07% return, which is significantly lower than FHUMX's 14.55% return.
BEARX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.59%
- YTD
- -6.07%
- 6M
- -5.46%
- 1Y
- -14.79%
- 3Y*
- -15.31%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- -14.57%
FHUMX
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 6M
- 12.01%
- 1Y
- 16.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- —
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | -6.07% | -12.42% | -20.34% | -18.67% | 17.78% | -23.78% | -19.71% |
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 14.55% | -1.38% | 9.90% | 21.92% | -16.51% | 22.94% | 27.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEARX and FHUMX is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2020 | -0.72 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between BEARX and FHUMX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.72 to -0.31, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEARX vs. FHUMX — Risk / Return Rank
BEARX
FHUMX
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) and Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEARX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.15 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 1.49 | -2.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 4.34 | -5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEARX drawdown since its inception was -95.75%, which is greater than FHUMX's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEARX and FHUMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEARX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.75% | -29.48% | -66.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.71% | -11.58% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.46% | -29.48% | -14.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.48% | -29.48% | -23.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.59% | -1.34% | -94.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -61.10% | -8.14% | -52.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.22% | 3.83% | +6.39% |
Volatility
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd (BEARX) is 5.53%, while Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund (FHUMX) has a volatility of 9.04%. This indicates that BEARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHUMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEARX | FHUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 9.04% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 16.42% | -6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 20.97% | -8.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 21.50% | -4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 21.22% | -4.51% |
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEARX has a 1.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FHUMX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEARX vs. FHUMX - Dividend Comparison
BEARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, less than FHUMX's 7.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEARX Federated Hermes Prudent Bear Fd | 7.15% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 13.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% |
FHUMX Federated Hermes U.S. SMID Fund | 7.47% | 8.56% | 0.93% | 4.41% | 2.77% | 4.05% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEARX and FHUMX have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHUMX has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to BEARX (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEARX dropped -95.75% vs FHUMX's -29.48%.
FHUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEARX and FHUMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer