BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO).
Performance
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 40.32% | 13.11% | 85.70% | 85.30% | -12.91% | 28.13% | 19.30% | 24.68% | -36.48% | 16.80% |
CEU.TO CES Energy Solutions Corp. | 50.04% | 26.24% | 192.68% | 28.94% | 39.80% | 61.31% | -44.70% | -24.06% | -51.19% | -14.27% |
Fundamentals
BDT.TO:
CA$2.21B
CEU.TO:
CA$3.97B
BDT.TO:
CA$0.86
CEU.TO:
CA$0.93
BDT.TO:
46.54
CEU.TO:
19.80
BDT.TO:
4.20
CEU.TO:
0.40
BDT.TO:
0.65
CEU.TO:
1.63
BDT.TO:
5.11
CEU.TO:
4.95
BDT.TO:
CA$3.40B
CEU.TO:
CA$2.49B
BDT.TO:
CA$341.72M
CEU.TO:
CA$586.20M
BDT.TO:
CA$165.08M
CEU.TO:
CA$373.83M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BDT.TO achieves a 40.32% return, which is significantly lower than CEU.TO's 50.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BDT.TO has underperformed CEU.TO with an annualized return of 18.97%, while CEU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.71% annualized return.
BDT.TO
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 25.20%
- YTD
- 40.32%
- 6M
- 33.59%
- 1Y
- 88.22%
- 3Y*
- 68.96%
- 5Y*
- 39.94%
- 10Y*
- 18.97%
CEU.TO
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 9.39%
- YTD
- 50.04%
- 6M
- 96.74%
- 1Y
- 152.48%
- 3Y*
- 94.04%
- 5Y*
- 66.35%
- 10Y*
- 21.71%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
BDT.TO
CEU.TO
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BDT.TO | CEU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.22 | 3.89 | -1.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.61 | 4.22 | -1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.64 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 6.25 | -2.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 16.96 | -5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BDT.TO | CEU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.22 | 3.89 | -1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 1.60 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between BDT.TO and CEU.TO is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Dividend Comparison
BDT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than CEU.TO's 0.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 1.93% | 2.95% | 2.26% | 2.96% | 4.88% | 4.03% | 4.95% | 5.54% | 6.48% | 3.91% | 8.34% | 5.82% |
CEU.TO CES Energy Solutions Corp. | 0.70% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 2.75% | 2.46% | 1.58% | 0.86% | 2.58% | 1.59% | 0.55% | 0.67% | 8.40% |
Drawdowns
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDT.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.33%, smaller than the maximum CEU.TO drawdown of -94.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDT.TO and CEU.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BDT.TO | CEU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.33% | -94.27% | +18.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.20% | -23.82% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.79% | -41.77% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.15% | -92.84% | +28.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.01% | +4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.11% | -39.08% | +13.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.29% | 8.78% | -0.49% |
Volatility
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.34% compared to CES Energy Solutions Corp. (CEU.TO) at 8.32%. This indicates that BDT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BDT.TO | CEU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.34% | 8.32% | +1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.21% | 26.38% | -3.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.01% | 39.48% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.49% | 41.82% | -8.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 51.31% | -17.91% |
Financials
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bird Construction Inc. and CES Energy Solutions Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BDT.TO vs. CEU.TO - Profitability Comparison
BDT.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a gross profit of 82.22M and revenue of 877.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.4%.
CEU.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CES Energy Solutions Corp. reported a gross profit of 157.34M and revenue of 664.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.7%.
BDT.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported an operating income of -16.80M and revenue of 877.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -1.9%.
CEU.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CES Energy Solutions Corp. reported an operating income of 70.94M and revenue of 664.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.7%.
BDT.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bird Construction Inc. reported a net income of -13.96M and revenue of 877.01M, resulting in a net margin of -1.6%.
CEU.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CES Energy Solutions Corp. reported a net income of 68.30M and revenue of 664.51M, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.