BDT.TO vs. ARE.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BDT.TO or ARE.TO.
Key characteristics
| BDT.TO | ARE.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 106.50% | 122.77% |
| 1Y Return | 161.32% | 176.33% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 48.37% | 24.63% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 40.37% | 14.03% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 15.11% | 12.79% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 3.75 | 4.98 |
| Sortino Ratio | 4.39 | 5.13 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.56 | 2.04 |
| Calmar Ratio | 7.25 | 2.40 |
| Martin Ratio | 22.95 | 39.14 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.60% | 4.67% |
| Daily Std Dev | 40.38% | 36.78% |
| Max Drawdown | -76.14% | -99.67% |
| Current Drawdown | -10.52% | -32.54% |
Fundamentals
| BDT.TO | ARE.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | CA$1.61B | CA$1.76B |
| EPS | CA$1.56 | -CA$1.03 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.55 | -8.20 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | CA$2.35B | CA$2.83B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | CA$196.13M | -CA$30.19M |
| EBITDA (TTM) | CA$104.41M | -CA$129.22M |
Correlation
The correlation between BDT.TO and ARE.TO is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BDT.TO vs. ARE.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, BDT.TO achieves a 106.50% return, which is significantly lower than ARE.TO's 122.77% return. Over the past 10 years, BDT.TO has outperformed ARE.TO with an annualized return of 15.11%, while ARE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 12.79% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BDT.TO vs. ARE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) and Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BDT.TO vs. ARE.TO - Dividend Comparison
BDT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than ARE.TO's 2.70% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BDT.TO Bird Construction Inc. | 1.93% | 3.20% | 4.80% | 3.97% | 4.88% | 5.45% | 6.38% | 3.85% | 8.38% | 5.84% | 6.84% | 5.79% |
ARE.TO Aecon Group Inc. | 2.70% | 5.81% | 8.34% | 4.27% | 3.91% | 3.34% | 2.84% | 2.51% | 3.02% | 2.60% | 3.36% | 1.99% |
Drawdowns
BDT.TO vs. ARE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BDT.TO drawdown since its inception was -76.14%, smaller than the maximum ARE.TO drawdown of -99.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BDT.TO and ARE.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BDT.TO vs. ARE.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Bird Construction Inc. (BDT.TO) is 15.96%, while Aecon Group Inc. (ARE.TO) has a volatility of 18.01%. This indicates that BDT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
BDT.TO vs. ARE.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bird Construction Inc. and Aecon Group Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities